So are you a class b or c idiot?
The Mclarens were different cars were they?
So Mclaren employed the 2 x reigning WC and gave him an inferior car to a rookie who only got the seat because there was no one else available apart from an old test driver?
Class d for dunce
*sigh*
There was no difference right up until after the Monaco GP where there was a difference of opinion over strategy. Lewis thought he could have passed Alonso when really Alonso was in engine save mode and could have danced off into the lead again at any time . Basically Lewis created a hooha out of nothing mouthing off about the team etc, to the press when clearly in the wrong. Strangely McLaren backed him and told Alonso to "go easy on him" as Alonso was understandably annoyed. After that there is a strange downturn in Alonso's results aand an upturn in Lewis' with Alonso reporting strange tyre pressures among other anomalies. Hamilton's final move was to break a gentleman's agreement they had all season in Hungary qualifying (again it is Hamilton stirring). The fall out is well documented but with the team principle coming out with statements like "we were racing fernando" it is not exactly hard to see where the backing was going. Obviously suspicions were aroused enough for the FIA to step in and appoint a steward to ensure parity.
The cars may look the same but there are tiny critical things that can affect performance a whole load like camber angles, engine mapping, gear ratios, tyre pressures, damping etc. Rest assured McLaren would undoubtedly have taken all the steps they could to ensure that Fernando would not br taking the No1 with him when he moved from the team
Edit: I will link to you what Andrew Benson had to say about Monaco 2007 -
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/andrewbenson/2010/05/alonso_overreaching_in_reargua.html
and copy and paste also
"Alonso's last victory in Monaco was in 2007, and it was the event that marked the beginning of the end of his relationship with McLaren and their former team principal Ron Dennis.
That race is remembered as one that Alonso won thanks to team orders, after McLaren told team-mate Lewis Hamilton to slow down and not challenge Alonso for the victory.
But that reading is wrong.
This has never come out before, but it was Dennis's actions after that race that so angered Alonso, and which convinced him the team would always be behind Hamilton and not him. That was the backdrop to the tumultuous fall-out that enveloped McLaren and Alonso as that famous 'spy-gate' summer unfolded.
As a McLaren insider revealed to me: "Fernando won in Monaco fair and square in 2007.
"Lewis was generally quicker through the weekend, but in qualifying Fernando did it and Lewis didn't. Lewis was quicker in the first run but then he made mistakes and Fernando got pole.
"Fernando won the race because he pulled an 11-second gap in the first stint when Lewis had (tyre) graining and after that Fernando was just cruising because we had rear brake issues.
"But after the race, Ron said to Fernando: 'Be nice to Lewis because we had to (pit) stop him early.' And Fernando said: 'What do you mean? I was just cruising.'
"He got very annoyed about that because it was like Ron saying we handed you the victory. Even after that, the relationship was unrecoverable."
Alonso might be over-reaching in his attempts to take the Ferrari to places where it should not be, but there seems no chance of his relationship with his new team deteriorating in the same way."