Transfer Rumours January Transfer Thread
- Thread starter originallambrettaman
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Kent might have an appallingly ****e attitude, but at least he draws the line at joining a fascist club, I suppose.
Eh? I'm suggesting he's out for the season. In which case why wouldn't he go back? Baz was saying just the other day we may well send him back if he's out for the season.
Was just mentioned on the 1904 thing that the club like having Liam D around a couple of days a week because of his love of being here, the other lads and his personality. Have no idea about the loan deal or the wages, but that sounds like a real positive moving forward.
Yep, can only help our chances at bringing him back next season too.
There's 'send him back' meaning for rehab or 'send him back' meaning cancel the remainder of the loan. We can't do the latter without all parties agreeing. He's our liability until the end of the season under the terms of the season long loan agreement unless Man C are being extremely charitable as there's no incentive for them to recall him, in fact it's the contrary.
Yes and Baz was talking complete garbage.
We can't just send him back because he's injured unless by some miracle City would let us.
Players tend to do their rehab with parent clubs (which makes complete sense, as he's their player). But any notion of cancelling the loan was never going to happen.
I agree. Totally different scenario to Vinagre or Oscar (even Twine) where it's in the parent clubs interest to find another loan as opportunity will be limited at the current loan clubs and the buy options won't be triggered if they stay.
I'm aware mate. Baz suggested we might cancel the loan if there was a need to do so on deadline day. It was suggested it may be necessary if the winger we brought in was a loan rather than permanent as initially planned. That's why I suggested that as Zaroury is a loan, it may well be that we're cancelling Delap's loan.
Wtf are you on about? If he's out for the season we may well have agreed to send him back with Man City. The fact that Zaroury is a loan suggested we may well have done that. What other clubs keep a player on loan who is out injured for the season?
It's not purely our choice to make, and whether he stays or goes it makes no difference to the matchday picture as the limitation of 5 is in any given matchday squad, not limited to 5 on the books.
https://open.spotify.com/episode/3PvAWPVdjAlBIT34fxMasI?si=e3078dad74d2457f
7:45 in. "I think it's got to a stage now where City might need that loan space."
7:45 in. "I think it's got to a stage now where City might need that loan space."
I never suggested it was purely our choice to make, I don't know why it's been read that way.
Again, I'm aware you can have 5 in the squad and as many others in the non-matchday squad.
You think he's talking **** that Man City might be happy to cancel the loan if he's out for the season?
Think we know the rules better than baz did tat the time. He's clarified that it's not happening on the live tonight.