Athletic reporting United considered recalling Amad but have decided not to
You must log in or register to see media
Athletic reporting United considered recalling Amad but have decided not to
You must log in or register to see media
I hope this is true. Lose Amad and we are really strugglingAthletic reporting United considered recalling Amad but have decided not to
You must log in or register to see media
It's only insulting if it's true, there is no chance that's all they have offered himIt’s insulting mate never mind not much of a pay rise!
From what I was told they made an offer on Tuesday gone, I don't know any increase on what's been postedBest and final?
So for clarity as this is important.From what I was told they made an offer on Tuesday gone, I don't know any increase on what's been posted
I said that excluding the add ons, we have not offered more than 10 as a basic, I don't know what the add ons are.So for clarity as this is important.
The two lads who have had info previously and have said we have offered £20k are wrong? And the actual offer is £800 more than he is on now?
Jesus mate, calm down. I asked a reasonable question. Nothing more.I said that excluding the add ons, we have not offered more than 10 as a basic, I don't know what the add ons are.
But if your unhappy with what I'm posting which is gen info as proved on the 21/22 wage structure, and them figs go into 2023, then I can easily stop.
I just pass on what I was told
If we are to believe it's all about "the model" and we have a particular ceiling with regards FFP then why don't they just make their best and final and be done with it? This talk of KLD "stepping in" may well be a good thing in the short term, but how does that contribute to making us sustainable?From what I was told they made an offer on Tuesday gone, I don't know any increase on what's been posted
Agree with all of this. We can be seen as a genuine option to allow PL clubs to develop their players. I guarantee Calum Doyle is wondering about his choices this season....This is all good for us, the more we bring these young lads on the more the big clubs will trust us with players.
Not ideal that we only get them for a year, but better to to have a year than not at all
Then add to that other young players seeing how we help development and they might want to be part of it
Exciting times ahead
Our best offer has been £ 9800 plus add ons.
But it's been rejected
We have to balance between loans and permanents. Forest used loans to go up last season and then needed 6 or 7 players just to stand still.Agree with all of this. We can be seen as a genuine option to allow PL clubs to develop their players. I guarantee Calum Doyle is wondering about his choices this season....
As long as it's no more than 2/3 players per season then I think it's a useful model
Agree. 2/3 is fine as long as we can still develop our own players at the same time. I wouldn't want any loan player to come in and be guaranteed a place ahead of our own players. The club is doing so much good work at the moment. We are a world away from the **** show that Madrox and Short presided over - there is genuine planning and forethought to our dealings. It's massively encouragingWe have to balance between loans and permanents. Forest used loans to go up last season and then needed 6 or 7 players just to stand still.
We must avoid doing that imo
Sorry but that's bullshit. You've got no credibility for me.
Patto that signed a new deal in the summer? Signed a.long term deal for £700 a week?Look at what we are paying Patterson our No1 keeper, £700 + clean sheet money, Fing darlo pay that