Transfer Rumours January Incoming/Outgoing...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I remember Phelan saying something along the lines of Robertson should be on a contract which reflects his performance levels and importance.

If he's on ****. Snodgrass was meant to be on ****. How have we got a £50m wage bill?

Also it's very worrying when we're losing our best players to Burnley. They're basically just a well run us.
 
I remember Phelan saying something along the lines of Robertson should be on a contract which reflects his performance levels and importance.

If he's on ****. Snodgrass was meant to be on ****. How have we got a £50m wage bill?

Also it's very worrying when we're losing our best players to Burnley. They're basically just a well run us.

Snodgrass was on north of 40k pw. That's not **** by anyone's standards.
 
"We've never been a selling club...until now" I believe is the full quote.

The Robertson one just can't be true, I refuse to believe it because it is so counter-productive and would completely contradict the manager.

36 hours left to pull several rabbits out the hat. Could be done but I suggest it is highly doubtful.
 
If these rumours are true then you have to question the brain-power at the club. Why bother bringing Marco in if you're gonna undercut him all the time.

Could be wrong of course but I think more calamity is brewing as we speak.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shark Sports