I feel a bit for Iniesta.
Messi and Ronaldo are two of the finest five or so footballers of all time (I think they're the best two, but I would imagine that few would deny they're in the top handful). There's a grouping at the top - Di Stefano, Pele, Cruyff, Maradona, Zidane, as well as the afore mentioned big two - who I'd put as the tier one all-time greats. However, I'd put Iniesta in a very strong position in the chasing pack, along with the likes of Maldini, Beckenbauer, Platini, van Basten, Puskas, Garrincha and the other Ronaldo. However, because he's played at the same time as (and in the same league/team as) two of the best of all time I think that his brilliance is overlooked. I remember him coming on in the 2006 CL final against Arsenal and just being transfixed by him. He transformed the game in a way that looked so simple and yet was mesmerising. I've followed his career closely since then and have never not enjoyed watching him play. I hope that history is kind to him.
On another note, if you ever get the chance to watch old footage of Di Stefano playing then do. Consider what the defenders were allowed to get away with, how heavy the ball was, how poor the pitches were. Just incredible.
No mention of Best? See how he played on mud heap pitches with defenders trying to cripple nim.
John Charles is up there with those as well.
I'd place Best in a notch down from those named. I appreciate it's not a particularly popular opinion with many in the UK, but I tend to think that his looks/attitude and the team he played for sees his talent a little over-exaggerated at times. With the players I mentioned, they pretty much all consistently won major trophies or inspired traditionally unsuccessful teams to bigger things (or both). They spent a long time at the top of their sport, and tended to do it in numerous leagues or at numerous levels (or both). Best was brilliant at the top level of British football but for varying reasons - some of which weren't his fault - he never left left the UK to play until he was way past his best, and he only flickered at international level (and at European level, beyond the 68 final). As I said, some of that wasn't his fault as playing in Europe was harder at that time and Northern Ireland were never going to be a footballing world power. But the players from round that era I listed tended to find a way around that, and Northern Ireland qualified for a World Cup in 1958 (before Best started playing for them ) and in 1982 and 1986 (the WCs after he stopped playing international football). There are players on that list who managed to inspire largely unremarkable international sides to great things through their brilliance, but Best never really did that.
That's not to say that I don't consider Best and all-time great and an incredible player - I do - I just put him a tier down from those that I've named, alongside the likes of Eusebio, Charles, Charlton, Baresi, Zico, Yashin and, from what I've read rather than seen, Meazza, along with a few others that I'll have forgotten about. If he'd had exactly the same career but he'd looked like Ralph Coates and played for Everton instead of Manchester United I don't think you'd get people claiming he was the greatest player of all time, as many Manchester United fans and people in Northern Ireland do. So yes, I consider Best to be one of the all-time great footballers, I just think there have been a number of players that were/are better than him.

I'd place Best in a notch down from those named. I appreciate it's not a particularly popular opinion with many in the UK, but I tend to think that his looks/attitude and the team he played for sees his talent a little over-exaggerated at times. With the players I mentioned, they pretty much all consistently won major trophies or inspired traditionally unsuccessful teams to bigger things (or both). They spent a long time at the top of their sport, and tended to do it in numerous leagues or at numerous levels (or both). Best was brilliant at the top level of British football but for varying reasons - some of which weren't his fault - he never left left the UK to play until he was way past his best, and he only flickered at international level (and at European level, beyond the 68 final). As I said, some of that wasn't his fault as playing in Europe was harder at that time and Northern Ireland were never going to be a footballing world power. But the players from round that era I listed tended to find a way around that, and Northern Ireland qualified for a World Cup in 1958 (before Best started playing for them ) and in 1982 and 1986 (the WCs after he stopped playing international football). There are players on that list who managed to inspire largely unremarkable international sides to great things through their brilliance, but Best never really did that.
That's not to say that I don't consider Best and all-time great and an incredible player - I do - I just put him a tier down from those that I've named, alongside the likes of Eusebio, Charles, Charlton, Baresi, Zico, Yashin and, from what I've read rather than seen, Meazza, along with a few others that I'll have forgotten about. If he'd had exactly the same career but he'd looked like Ralph Coates and played for Everton instead of Manchester United I don't think you'd get people claiming he was the greatest player of all time, as many Manchester United fans and people in Northern Ireland do. So yes, I consider Best to be one of the all-time great footballers, I just think there have been a number of players that were/are better than him.
Interesting to compare his career medal tally with other greats of the modern era such as Maldini/Giggs/Matthaus etc. As of December 2015 this stood at:
-7 Spanish La Liga titles (2005, 2006, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013, 2015)
-6 Spanish Super Cups (2005, 2006, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013)
-3 Spanish Cup winners medals (2005, 2009, 2012)
-4 UEFA Champions League (2006, 2009, 2011, 2015)
-3 European Super Cups (2005, 2009, 2011)
-2 European Championships(2008, 2012)
-1 World Cup (2010)
-3 FIFA Club World Cups(2009, 2011, 2015)
Clearly made up, as iniesta plays on the left.You must log in or register to see media
Pele said was Best was the best player he had seen . But what does he know?![]()
There's an interesting article here that looks at who the greats ranked as the greatest ever. Best doesn't get a look in.
Pele has said lots of things that are questionable when it comes to football. He's often being diplomatic - the best player in the world or at a tournament often changes depending on the country he's in or the TV company interviewing him. I'm not sure how much of Best Pele can have seen either. Pele seemed to think that he himself was the greatest of all time when really pressed. There's an interesting article here that looks at who the greats ranked as the greatest ever. Best doesn't get a look in.
For me that's right. While medals alone don't signify greatness, the true greats did tend to win the big things. Pele has his three World Cups, Maradona has a World Cup, Serie A title and UEFA Cup (when it was probably harder to win the the European Cup) all won nigh on single-handedly. Beckenbauer, Zidane, Iniesta and Cruyff excelled on the World Cup stage, won European Cups galore and have numerous national titles. Di Stefano has five European Cup winners medals. So does Maldini. Best doesn't come close to those sort of stats. None of which matters in the grand scheme of things. It's all subjective. If you think Best belongs in such company then who am I to argue, other than some nob head on an internet football forum?
