Hull plot £6million Steven Fletcher move

[Neil]

There's no point in arguing with this "Hull Tigers (DMD)" wum. He'll complain that you're being disrespectful in a post where he also gets a worse dig in at our own club, and will argue one thing when it works in Hulls favour, but then take completely the opposite view when the same logic goes against them. Just look at his posts on here (and their own forum) from when we last played them. He tries to comes across all reasonable, whilst actually being completely the opposite.

Wait for the end of the season, and let's see how well Hull are doing then.

 

[over18and legal]

Correction for you ......... the many posts on your board say the complete opposite.

Besides it's not possible to hate a man's actions without hating the man.

You'll argue that it is possible but only because you're trying hard to make a point.

BTW, wouldn't you rather have the easier games at home?

Sunderland have a January with 5 of 7 games at home while Hull have only one home game, Chelsea.

You then have Spurs Southampton, Newcastle, Man City at home in succession.

I think I know thew feeling as regards our owner better than you thats for sure.
I totally disagree with you on hating someone because of his actions....I hate the actions of my boss from time to time but I respect him as a person and realise that he has difficult decisions to make.
Our so called easiest game so far was Palace at home. We got beat. You won at Everton and nobody saw that coming except some Sunland fans.
I would have thought that anyone following football would know there is such thing as a 'banker'

 

[Smug in Boots]

There's no point in arguing with this "Hull Tigers (DMD)" wum. He'll complain that you're being disrespectful in a post where he also gets a worse dig in at our own club, and will argue one thing when it works in Hulls favour, but then take completely the opposite view when the same logic goes against them. Just look at his posts on here (and their own forum) from when we last played them. He tries to comes across all reasonable, whilst actually being completely the opposite.

Wait for the end of the season, and let's see how well Hull are doing then.

Other than it's funny mate

He has the same set of dismal responses for every situation.

The one he's using on here is that he knows better about the Hull board's views than anyone from Sunderland despite everyone having access to exactly the same information.
If you remind him he'll claim that he has the views of 'people on the streets of Hull' to back him up ............. as if a handful of supporters represent the views of the majority.
What does he do, go around interviewing people in the street

His little pal comes on here to claim that 'Sunderland are in disarray' without a clue about the true situation so I post a 'tongue in cheek' response to show how easy it is to make spurious claims.
So SuperMod, who never mentions he's a mod , comes steaming in taking everything literally and claiming he knows the truth and that most Tigers don't hate the owner.
He obviously has no proof which ironically means he's just making things up to back up his spurious claim. He reckons there are several threads saying people don't hate the owner and I'll happily admit I was wrong when he posts them.

TBH mate, I love watching him squirming around, avoiding awkward questions he can't answer and posting inappropriate smileys when he's struggling.

 

[Smug in Boots]

I think I know thew feeling as regards our owner better than you thats for sure.

You speak for yourself, not the majority of Hull supporters ........ you're basing your opinion on the few supporters you know and basing the rest on the media and the Hull board.


I totally disagree with you on hating someone because of his actions....I hate the actions of my boss from time to time but I respect him as a person and realise that he has difficult decisions to make.

The difference is that you know your boss personally, the owner is a different thing entirely because you only know the public image.
I've seen many posts on the Hull board saying they hate the owner, not just his actions .......... are you saying those supporters are wrong?
How can you know what the majority of people think, you're generalising just as I am.

Our so called easiest game so far was Palace at home. We got beat. You won at Everton and nobody saw that coming except some Sunland fans.
I would have thought that anyone following football would know there is such thing as a 'banker'

Who said anything about bankers? I didn't.

I'm talking about the logic of decades of history .... teams are more likely to win games at home and more likely to beat teams in the lower half of the table than the top half.
That's why the teams in the top/bottom half are where they are.

You can always pull out exceptions but the facts remain the same.

 

[DMD]

There's no need to laugh, makes you look a bit daft ........... I know as much as everyone else, the same information is available to everyone.
There's been a great deal of hatred, towards the owner, on your board as you well know.
If you now choose to claim that's untrue then that's your choice.

Anyway, I'm sure you'll post the 'several threads discussing the fact that most people don't hate the owners' and put me straight.
Most people? I'm sure you've evidence to back up that claim.

I laugh because you're funny. You don't realise why, but you are. You hardly need a smiley face to look daft.


Your daft questions on our board showed you don'tunderstand it, the fact you claimed some of ours agreed with you, without realising it was one poster that was banned for being a mulitposting wum helps confirm your lack of knowledge, never mind the obvious fact that there's more going on than is posted on the board.

The 'hatred' is about the decision, not the person. The campaign blog shows that very clearly.

Just face it, you're wrong again, it's hardly a first.

Having more knowledge ad trying to share it may wind some of you up, but that does't make me a wum.

 

[over18and legal]

Who said anything about bankers? I didn't.

I'm talking about the logic of decades of history .... teams are more likely to win games at home and more likely to beat teams in the lower half of the table than the top half.
That's why the teams in the top/bottom half are where they are.

You can always pull out exceptions but the facts remain the same.

History also proves that with the excption of 1 year, the team at the bottom of the league ay xmas gets relegated.

 

[Commachio]

[video=youtube;c6MlrPESdDI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6MlrPESdDI[/video]

 

[Brian Storm]

[video=youtube;c6MlrPESdDI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6MlrPESdDI[/video]

Saw Anti Nowhere League at Trillians. Excellent night.

 

[Commachio]

Saw Anti Nowhere League at Trillians. Excellent night.

Got punk playing now. Some great old stuff.

 

[Brian Storm]

double post

 

[Brian Storm]

Got punk playing now. Some great old stuff.

A genre I don't listen to much these days. but one I do enjoy. Buzzcocks and XTC were good live as well. Always preferred british punk though there are some belting Ramones tunes.

[video=youtube;p2Mi995ggFU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2Mi995ggFU[/video]

 

[Smug in Boots]

I laugh because you're funny. You don't realise why, but you are. You hardly need a smiley face to look daft.


Your daft questions on our board showed you don'tunderstand it, the fact you claimed some of ours agreed with you, without realising it was one poster that was banned for being a mulitposting wum helps confirm your lack of knowledge, never mind the obvious fact that there's more going on than is posted on the board.

The 'hatred' is about the decision, not the person. The campaign blog shows that very clearly.

Just face it, you're wrong again, it's hardly a first.

Having more knowledge ad trying to share it may wind some of you up, but that does't make me a wum.

Your problem is that you keep repeating that I'm wrong but you never actually prove I'm wrong ....... not once.

You don't have any 'knowledge', you're just guessing and acting as a spokesman for people you don't represent and don't even know.
You claim most people don't hate the owner, where are your statistics and facts to back that up?
What 'knowledge' are you talking about other than wild speculation?

So, for a laugh, why not actually prove me wrong and post these several threads of yours, as I asked in the previous post,

"Anyway, I'm sure you'll post the 'several threads discussing the fact that most people don't hate the owners' and put me straight.
Most people? I'm sure you've evidence to back up that claim."

You've ignored that once, let's see how many times you do that .............

 

[DMD]

Your problem is that you keep repeating that I'm wrong but you never actually prove I'm wrong ....... not once.

You don't have any 'knowledge', you're just guessing and acting as a spokesman for people you don't represent and don't even know.
You claim most people don't hate the owner, where are your statistics and facts to back that up?
What 'knowledge' are you talking about other than wild speculation?

So, for a laugh, why not actually prove me wrong and post these several threads of yours, as I asked in the previous post,

"Anyway, I'm sure you'll post the 'several threads discussing the fact that most people don't hate the owners' and put me straight.
Most people? I'm sure you've evidence to back up that claim."

You've ignored that once, let's see how many times you do that .............

I ignored it because it's just your desperate attempt not to look wrong yet again. Experience has shown that all you'll do is squirm and wriggle even when the truth is right there.

It's not my guess, or even my opinion, it's a thread of the petition and the campaign people have signed up to. There have also been numerous discussions on the boards discussing that very topic and concluding that it's about the the issue, not the person.

I doubt you'll accept it, you're too precious to accept you get things wrong. You'll just wriggle and try to make it personal.

After all, what sort of pompous fool would think they know a situation better than those involved?

 

[Smug in Boots]

I ignored it because it's just your desperate attempt not to look wrong yet again. Experience has shown that all you'll do is squirm and wriggle even when the truth is right there.

It's not my guess, or even my opinion, it's a thread of the petition and the campaign people have signed up to. There have also been numerous discussions on the boards discussing that very topic and concluding that it's about the the issue, not the person.

I doubt you'll accept it, you're too precious to accept you get things wrong. You'll just wriggle and try to make it personal.

After all, what sort of pompous fool would think they know a situation better than those involved?

#2 That's twice you've ignored the question so I'll post it again.

"Anyway, I'm sure you'll post the 'several threads discussing the fact that most people don't hate the owners' and put me straight.
Most people? I'm sure you've evidence to back up that claim."


You claim that 'most people don't hate the owner' but that's just total guesswork on your part ....... you can't prove me wrong and you know it.

This knowledge you claim to have is pure speculation so why would that wind anyone up?
You claim that most people don't hate the owner and no one on here cares either way, why would that wind anyone up?

I'm making nothing personal, I'm talking to your personally ......... don't do your normal wriggle, just post the proof that I'm wrong.

 

[Brian Storm]

Can you not go torture this prick on their board Sumg? He's ****ing boring, goes to neighboring boards turning every thread he comes across into a Hull thread. He's ****ing dick who wrecks our board when ever he turns up.

 

[DMD]

#2 That's twice you've ignored the question so I'll post it again.

"Anyway, I'm sure you'll post the 'several threads discussing the fact that most people don't hate the owners' and put me straight.
Most people? I'm sure you've evidence to back up that claim."


You claim that 'most people don't hate the owner' but that's just total guesswork on your part ....... you can't prove me wrong and you know it.

This knowledge you claim to have is pure speculation so why would that wind anyone up?
You claim that most people don't hate the owner and no one on here cares either way, why would that wind anyone up?

I'm making nothing personal, I'm talking to your personally ......... don't do your normal wriggle, just post the proof that I'm wrong.

No silly, not that you're Jeremy Paxman or anything, but I answered your question, it's you ignoring them.





I ignored it because it's just your desperate attempt not to look wrong yet again. Experience has shown that all you'll do is squirm and wriggle even when the truth is right there.

It's not my guess, or even my opinion, it's a thread of the petition and the campaign people have signed up to. There have also been numerous discussions on the boards discussing that very topic and concluding that it's about the the issue, not the person.

I doubt you'll accept it, you're too precious to accept you get things wrong. You'll just wriggle and try to make it personal.

After all, what sort of pompous fool would think they know a situation better than those involved?

 

[Smug in Boots]

Can you not go torture this prick on their board Sumg? He's ****ing boring, goes to neighboring boards turning every thread he comes across into a Hull thread. He's ****ing dick who wrecks our board when ever he turns up.

You're right mate, he's the kind who thinks that endlessly repeating that he's right proves he's right.

I'll ignore him for the sake of the board

 

[Brian Storm]

You're right mate, he's the kind who thinks that endlessly repeating that he's right proves he's right.

I'll ignore him for the sake of the board

It ****ing tempting I know. I've written three different posts since he turned up again and managed to stop myself from clicking the post button. I get a feeling of dread whenever the nobhead turns up. The longer he's here chances are more of them will turn up. It wouldn't be so bad if it wasn't for their feral pack mentality.

 

[Commachio]

No silly, not that you're Jeremy Paxman or anything, but I answered your question, it's you ignoring them.





I ignored it because it's just your desperate attempt not to look wrong yet again. Experience has shown that all you'll do is squirm and wriggle even when the truth is right there.

It's not my guess, or even my opinion, it's a thread of the petition and the campaign people have signed up to. There have also been numerous discussions on the boards discussing that very topic and concluding that it's about the the issue, not the person.

I doubt you'll accept it, you're too precious to accept you get things wrong. You'll just wriggle and try to make it personal.

After all, what sort of pompous fool would think they know a situation better than those involved?

[video=youtube;N9qCb1kyASE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9qCb1kyASE[/video]

 

[Shameless]

You must log in or register to see images