Match Day Thread Hull City v Arsenal

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
MadridTiger said:
They ran after the ball ie became active. ARsenal players were disrupted due to their movement. AGain, active
Click to expand...
They didn't run after it!!! They ran in when the shot was played. Not one of the players in an offside position attempted to collect the ball after it was saved as it went off to the side and Powell was in a better position to take possession. Therefor it is NOT offside.
 
SydneyTiger14 said:
That tweet isn't wrong, it's the fact those players then follow the ball in.
Click to expand...
They're not active though! Jesus Christ what is so hard for people to understand!? If the save from the keeper was collected by them then yes I would agree it was offside, but as none of them attempted to collect the ball after the original save none of them where ever classed as active. I'm
Not sure how it can be any clearer
 
Kevin Francis said:
They're not active though! Jesus Christ what is so hard for people to understand!? If the save from the keeper was collected by them then yes I would agree it was offside, but as none of them attempted to collect the ball after the original save none of them where ever classed as active. I'm
Not sure how it can be any clearer
Click to expand...
You don't have to touch the ball to be offside, you do realise this yes? If you're offside and move to play the ball as they did then it's technically offside. Harsh call but not incorrect.

Anyway time to move on, no use crying over spilt milk.
 
Kevin Francis said:
They're not active though! Jesus Christ what is so hard for people to understand!? If the save from the keeper was collected by them then yes I would agree it was offside, but as none of them attempted to collect the ball after the original save none of them where ever classed as active. I'm
Not sure how it can be any clearer
Click to expand...
Diomande was. He went after the ball. What are you watching?
 
SydneyTiger14 said:
I presume they mean the build up which was very tidy.
Click to expand...

It really wasn't.

It was a one, two yard, pass build up. A poor attempt at a "Zidane" like turn that he ****ed up losing control of the ball. He got two lucky bounces off his own feet, his scuffed shot took a very fortunate deflection which wrong footed McGregor & rolled into the net.

It was **** from start to finish.
 
Craigo said:
How could Meyler not even look up while passing casually across his own packed penalty box with the outside of his foot against Arsenal !!!!!!!

Answer; You get intelligent footballers and unintelligent ones and Meyler is profoundly unintelligent.
Click to expand...
How could he?.....he is a **** footballer....next question
 
Craigo said:
How could Meyler not even look up while passing casually across his own packed penalty box with the outside of his foot against Arsenal !!!!!!!

Answer; You get intelligent footballers and unintelligent ones and Meyler is profoundly unintelligent.
Click to expand...

Meyler had a mare of a first half. It wasn't just that (bloody ridiculous) error.
Take him off. Put Diame in midfield where he should be playing. Sorted.
 
SydneyTiger14 said:
You don't have to touch the ball to be offside, you do realise this yes? If you're offside and move to play the ball as they did then it's technically offside. Harsh call but not incorrect.

Anyway time to move on, no use crying over spilt milk.
Click to expand...
My point to both you and Madrid tiger was the fact no one made an attempt to move towards the ball. But yes let's move on and agree to disagree
 
Craigo said:
How could Meyler not even look up while passing casually across his own packed penalty box with the outside of his foot against Arsenal !!!!!!!

Answer; You get intelligent footballers and unintelligent ones and Meyler is profoundly unintelligent.
Click to expand...

I like Meyler but he's just daft isn't he. He does things that just make you wonder what he was thinking.
 
Craigo said:
How could Meyler not even look up while passing casually across his own packed penalty box with the outside of his foot against Arsenal !!!!!!!

Answer; You get intelligent footballers and unintelligent ones and Meyler is profoundly unintelligent.
Click to expand...
The co comentator on BT said what is it with Hull City players flicking it with the outside of their feet
 
Willson said:
Savage pointed out that it was the wrong decision.
Click to expand...

I'm not getting into the whole offside debate - I just want to say that no one should EVER use something Robbie Savage has said to bolster their argument. Trust me, it just achieves the opposite.

All he's fit to talk about is how your dog can get a nice shiny coat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SydneyTiger14
Tuckin said:
I'm not getting into the whole offside debate - I just want to say that no one should EVER use something Robbie Savage has said to bolster their argument. Trust me, it just achieves the opposite.

All he's fit to talk about is how your dog can get a nice shiny coat.
Click to expand...
I did enjoy everyone slating him all game for talking **** but are now using him to back themselves up. Arf.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back