Bruce was granted his.1000th game
against Spurs
I didn’t know, the clip just said he was the negative. Fair play to him/AS.
Bruce was granted his.1000th game
against Spurs
They did actually, was draws rather than wins though but still, small gains.![]()

I didn’t know, the clip just said he was the negative. Fair play to him/AS.
Bottom line is Bruce spent £160m in 2 years, and ****ed off to Portugal leaving his coaches to the training during first international break of the season, snapping at reporters "what am I meant to do? We had 6 players away" When asked about going on holiday he snapped at Craig Hope "This is what the fans want to know is it? This is typical of you and your paper"
![]()
More a case of not overreacting than defending him in particularAgain I just want to understand why people are so keen to defend him?
How does someone “go out on their shield” when you haven’t backed them? Sack him or back him, anything else is just snideHowe has done nothing but ride a wave of money... nothing improved until after the first big spend and when the money ran out unsurprisingly it appears so did his messiah like ability .
Edwards enjoys making the fans look bad and that's his motive on this. Howe has had great fan support, but no matter how **** he does the media narrative will be that he was unfairly treated and the fans have unrealistic expectations.
This is why I want them to allow Howe to carry on a while longer or perhaps finish the season, but give him nothing in January... let him go out on his shield
They?
How does someone “go out on their shield” when you haven’t backed them? Sack him or back him, anything else is just snide
Burnley?Bruce got draws it was the fact we hadn't won a game fans were screaming about and rightly so, but we didn't win under Howe until after the first spend.
Yawn you keep repeating spend from the past but don’t accept your own point that you have to keep spending. Back him or sack him otherwise it’s snide.He has been backed..not being backed was rafa.
Howes had big money even by Premier league standards never mind Newcastle standards.
Burnley?
So your point was wrong. Thank youYes sorry that's actually right, but I maintain nothing really improved until after the first 150 million was spent.
Howe had 1 in 9 before the spend
Now 2 in the last 11.
Selecting just part of the season again? 2 in 11? Remind us when the season startedYes sorry that's actually right, but I maintain nothing really improved until after the first 150 million was spent.
Howe had 1 in 9 before the spend
Now 2 in the last 11.
Yawn you keep repeating spend from the past but don’t accept your own point that you have to keep spending. Back him or sack him otherwise it’s snide.
Selecting just part of the season again? 2 in 11? Remind us when the season started
The maximum and beyond would mean last winter and the summer, when he wasn’t so your talking rubbish. The sales of those two players even emphasises the pointThe money has been spent so he has been backed to the maximum and beyond which is why we had to sell minteh and Anderson.
The maximum and beyond would mean last winter and the summer, when he wasn’t so your talking rubbish. The sales of those two players even emphasises the point
No I’m quoting the actual last two windows and you propose not backing him in the next one either.Such as yourself with regards to transfer windows and spend.