That ol'chestnut being played again. In the cold light of day there's no difference. They're offensive and have no place in football. The consequences clearly werent fully thought out right by the clypes.
Some people started something. To see it out they would have to make a sacrifice to see their rivals punished. now that its their turn to hold the moral high ground they can't hack it. Hypocrites!
Of course there is a difference. You can't compartmentalise this into "us and them". You have to deal with the facts of the matter and deal with that accordingly. Out of interest, which of these songs do you think can be construed as offensive?
I may have to accept that the songs may fall foul of UEFA regulations(as shown below) but whilst not looking to indulge in whataboutery, it will be interesting to see UEFA close every single ground under their jurisdiction.
2 The same disciplinary measures may be taken against member associations or
clubs in case of inappropriate behaviour on the part of their supporters,
including:
a) the invasion or attempted invasion of the field of play;
b) the throwing of objects;
c) the lighting of fireworks or any other objects;
d) the use of laser pointers or similar electronic devices;
e) the use of gestures, words, objects or any other means to transmit any
message that is not fit for a sports event, in particular if it is of a political,
offensive or provocative nature;
f) acts of damage;
g) any other lack of order or discipline observed inside or around the stadium.
http://www.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles/...7_DOWNLOAD.pdf
caught? you are a ****ing spastic.