Hope this is not true...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
To be honest, when I heard Warm Pouch say that Sessegnon will almost certainly be banned, and then watched the video, I thought "is that it?".

However, after watching it a good 10 times over I have to say that it looks far more like an intentional stamp. I may have been more unsure if it was just out of the blue, but the fact is that Sessegnon had a real reason to have intent due to Arteta's dive, and it's these moments of blind frustration which cause players to lash out like that and do stupid things.

I'm very tempted tp press that link you have at the bottom of your screen...
 
I'm very tempted tp press that link you have at the bottom of your screen...

Feel free. Although tell me if you do just so I know that any replies I say to you won't be seen. Don't want to be wasting my time.

But please, take off the biased specs for a minute, watch the video a few times, and then tell me whether I MIGHT, just might, have a point.
 
I'm very tempted tp press that link you have at the bottom of your screen...

Feel free. Although tell me if you do just so I know that any replies I say to you won't be seen. Don't want to be wasting my time.

But please, take off the biased specs for a minute, watch the video a few times, and then tell me whether I MIGHT, just might, have a point.

My worry is that the FA will see it the way you have said. Our best chance will be if the referee had seen it and it's been classed as dealt with at the time
 
Feel free. Although tell me if you do just so I know that any replies I say to you won't be seen. Don't want to be wasting my time.

But please, take off the biased specs for a minute, watch the video a few times, and then tell me whether I MIGHT, just might, have a point.

I was only joking regarding the button...And as for the so-called stamp, he has nothing to answer to as far as I'm concerned, and I would be shocked if it went any further...
 
What recent "incidents" - you mean your failed Cabaye appeal?

Cabaye there was doubt as it was a tangle of legs (kicked him for me), Balotelli there was doubt (still not sure on that one as I think my thoughts on Balotelli probably cloud my judgement) are two I can think of off the top of my head. There is one nearly every week it seems now. Then again Lescott got off with a blatant elbow in the Spurs match.

Who knows, the FA are completely incompetent and inconsistent but in general they tend to charge them.
 
My worry is that the FA will see it the way you have said. Our best chance will be if the referee had seen it and it's been classed as dealt with at the time

The major issue, to me, is the combination of intent plus the 'stamp' (accidental or otherwise). If Sessegnon had absolutely no reason to do that, then it's easier to view it as an accident. However, an incident happened seconds prior to the stamp (Arteta diving with seconds left on the clock) which gave Sessegnon a big reason to be very angry and frustrated. The FA will know about this, and I do think they will factor it in, which could be the big turning point.

PS: Just imagine that you're in Sessegnon's boots. Arsenal have just scored against you RIGHT at the end of the match, and with seconds left, you're desperate to try and get something out of the game. You go in to get the ball from Arteta, but from the SLIGHTEST of touches, Arteta drops to the ground, wins a foul and pretty much wastes up those last remaining seconds of game time. Do you think that could be an incident which could cause the dreaded 'red mist' and result in a moment of stupidity as he lashes out in frustration?
 
The double standards is laughable. Sess goes studs down on the ankle, intent to harm or not, he still did. And should be punished for doing so like other players have been (Balotelli, Cabaye). You all slated Huth, barely touched Meyler and his legs were tucked in. No harm nor intent, like you all said though, the potential was there.
 
Are you insane?

He trots over to get the ball, on no ****ing planet in any universe could that be construed as a deliberate stamp.

That's the point though, deliberate does not come into for the FA most of the time. They just look at the incident, charge and feel great about themselves. As I've already said I doubt he intended to jump on his leg, but he did and that is how the FA will judge it. Not commenting whether its right or wrong, but f they going to be consistent then they'll have to charge him.
 
Are you insane?

He trots over to get the ball, on no ****ing planet in any universe could that be construed as a deliberate stamp.

That's the point though, deliberate does not come into for the FA most of the time. They just look at the incident, charge and feel great about themselves. As I've already said I doubt he intended to jump on his leg, but he did and that is how the FA will judge it. Not commenting whether its right or wrong, but f they going to be consistent then they'll have to charge him.

Only if the referee hasnt seen it.....
 
The referee saw it and dealt with it at the time. Ergo, that should be the end of it.

You'd think so but the refs on Cabaye and Balotelli also saw it and dealt with it at the time only to change their tune after watching a replay. They just seem to bypass this premise when it suits.
 
The double standards is laughable. Sess goes studs down on the ankle, intent to harm or not, he still did. And should be punished for doing so like other players have been (Balotelli, Cabaye). You all slated Huth, barely touched Meyler and his legs were tucked in. No harm nor intent, like you all said though, the potential was there.

We never slated Huth, we slated Pulis for being a ****ing ****er.

I'm sure Wearside & Tyneside can unite on that one!

We gave Huth great credit for speaking out, in fact.
 
Anyone else get the feeling that Chapps, Pouch et al are worried about our Sess?

I'd be chuffed to bits if Sessegnon was banned. He's your best player. Why wouldn't I be?

My moaning on a forum isn't going to make a jot of difference to the outcome though, so I have no reason to really be biased about it. I'm just saying what I see.
 
meh, nowt much in it in my opinion either but naturally i think that sess should be hung out to dry, hung drawn and quartered etc in time for the Derby.McClean should get the same for being in close proximity.
 
Skunk here, seems pretty innocuous to me. If you watch anything in slow motion, it can look bad, but watching it in real time, looks like he was getting the ball to get on with the game.