It depends if it's in or out of water surely?Nessie would wipe the floor with Bigfoot![]()
It depends if it's in or out of water surely?Nessie would wipe the floor with Bigfoot![]()
It depends if it's in or out of water surely?
Whatever the spend was, it wasnt enough. We needed at least two more signings.
We'd have to agree a venue yes. The Loch Ness Inn car park?

True, add on agent's fees, potential bonuses & other costs & which haven't yet been disclosed then you're probably looking at upward of £25mJesus Christ, all this arguing when all the fees - I think - were undisclosed. None of you know how much the total outlay was so its an entirely pointless discussion.
WTF, where has it been widely suggested £3 million? It's the first I'm hearing of this, nothing more than £1 million has been the only figures I've seen.
As for City Wall's argument of £14 million over £13.5 million. What the **** does it matter over half a million?
The £13 million for Mason was originally said to be £12.5, so there's your half a million.
All pretty pointless anyway as someone said, they're all undisclosed, so until the accounts come out for this period & Peter dishes the dirt on the spend, I suggest no more arguing over things that can't be proved!
It's like trying to predict the winner of a fight between the Loch Ness Monster & The Abominable Snowman!
£3m was reported in SSN .. whether it's correct or not remains to be seen
Anyone who thinks we weren't overly negative for the past two seasons obviously didn't watch many games, Phelan's a breath of fresh air.
Ever since I first started watching City, we have had fans who demand we attack more.True
Ever since I first started watching City, we have had fans who demand we attack more.
It's a given, as it is with all other clubs.
It's not really a serious or measurable standpoint, more an impression or feeling.
Ever since I first started watching City, we have had fans who demand we attack more.
It's a given, as it is with all other clubs.
It's not really a serious or measurable standpoint, more an impression or feeling.
Everyone who attached a fee to Keane said £1m, including Sky.
Twenty.You hear it less at clubs who don't take all their strikers off with twenty minutes to go, desperately trying to cling on to a draw or a one goal lead.

I saw it on SSN as 3m for Keane on that pop up bar on the right of the screen, although everywhere else I saw reported it as 1m
Twenty.
So when did Phelan take our centre forward off? Desperately clinging on to a point was he? what was it 37% possession.
Apparently a moggie once appeared on the pitch at Anfield and the scousers all started singing "a cat, a cat" to the same 'tune'. Made me laugh anyway.The most stomach turning, cringeworthy and banal chant is "attack, attack" blah blah - the one favoured by FIFA playing aficionados I believe.
We took a striker off, a clearly fit one and put a CB on. You're trying to see summat that isnt there.Phelan's never finished a game without a striker on the pitch, we were obviously clinging on against Man United, but only because they're better than us and we had almost no options from the bench.
We took a striker off, a clearly fit one and put a CB on. You're trying to see summat that isnt there.
We defended and defended and didnt attack much against Swansea or Man U. But hey ho people see and believe what they want.