I see Wenger has landed him on a short term loan. Surely he has to be past it for the Premiership. Got me thinking though. Any of our old boys you would want to see back? Should we tempt Le God out of retirement!

So a 34 year old striker that has been playing at the very top level for his whole career signs for arsenal as cover for chamakh who's rubbish and gervhinio who is not alot better and its being described as disastrous. I actually think he will do a very good job for Arsenal and i don't see in any way how it can be a bad thing for them.
The very top level for his whole career except the last three years of either playing 5 minute sub games or playing in the MLS... yeah he's not a top of the Premiership level striker.
.
121 apperances in his 3 seasons at barcelona and 32 of those in his last season seems pretty good to me, i agree majority might of been as sub but but thats still an impressive record for such a DISASTROUS signing
One of my friends is an Arsenal fan - he says it was great news to hear Henry being in training with the Arsenal lads because it would obviously be a morale boost and he'd have so much to teach the younger players with his wealth of talent and experience. However, to sign him to the actual squad is disastrous because he just won't be good enough any more and should be there in nothing more than a non-player capacity. I can't see him being wrong.
[IF Rickie was to be unavailable for a protracted period, I wouldn`t mind having Kevin Davies on loan.I see Wenger has landed him on a short term loan. Surely he has to be past it for the Premiership. Got me thinking though. Any of our old boys you would want to see back? Should we tempt Le God out of retirement!
His last season hardly counts, loads were off the bench. Even so 4 goals in 32 games is horrendous - so what is it, are they signing somebody who hasn't the fitness to play often, or are they signing someone who in a good league (MLS, not the bloody La Liga) can't hit the back of the net to save their life?