It's not a criticism, it's an observation.
Vagueness actually relate to the ealien part of my original question.
How did we get on to Sigourney Weaver films?
It's not a criticism, it's an observation.
Vagueness actually relate to the ealien part of my original question.
It's a local rag, dependent on advertising from local businesses, expectations are therefore unrealistic.
But feel free to keep whining on about it anyway, if it makes you happy.
How did we get on to Sigourney Weaver films?![]()

I do think there would be a benefit in clarity about what exactly is being protested about...but only because there are so many things to choose from!
The red card one was clearly about trying to stop the membership scheme being introduced, so what exactly is the main focus this time ? ( I may have missed something though to be fair)
So, is the revenue from City's adverts vital for the HDM? Or would they lose loads of others if they were critical of the Allams?
For clarity, what is the actual aim of the protest?
The op says it's 'against the way the club is run' which is a tad vague.
It'll be interesting to see what the other bits of the protest are, as the cards work okay for making people think they're involved, but in reality, they didn't work for the membership scheme.
All in all, fair play to the trust for doing something, but I can't help feeling they'd hae made a stronger point about fans being involved in discussions, if they'd have done the same themselves.
No doubt I'll get the usual abuse for having an opinion on how a protest could be made more effective.
You're either oblivious to the typos you're making, or you're making up words as you go.
Isn't the point of the trust so organise these things on behalf of its membership? It says members have been emailing them etc. with ideas which is surely the fans being involved?
If the fans have to all gather in a big room everytime something needs discussing they'd never be at work.
If typo's due to posting from my phone are the best the hard of thinking can come up with, maybe it's not such a bad thing.
Lol I'm not the only one who had no clue what you were on about.


Thinking about it... For those who refuse to enter the stadium on August 13 but under normal circumstances would have.. who's up for donating one match ticket money to help with the cause. I'd be happy to.
INFACT... just looking http://www.hobbycraft.co.uk/hobbycraft-a4-red-card-75-pack/562239-1003
Are these any good...?
Have you seen how much advertising the Club With No Name is doing with the HDM at the moment? Sadly this means there's no way they'll take an anti Allam stance.
That doesn't explain why the BBC haven't fully reported, pressed or asked the harsher questions when they have had the opportunity to.
The HDM really cant do anything at all but the way Humberside and Look North creep around the subject is pathetic. Since 2009 the Premier League have stated that pre and post match interviews with rights holders are mandatory as well as access to reporters for commentary and updates so they wouldn't lose out on coverage.
It doesn't have to be a big room. If the email argument, or reading of web sites works, the Allams could claim the same.
Don't those rules only apply to TV broadcasters?
I assumed not as Talksport and Radio 5 Live were specifically mentioned when they granted wider access in 2013 and clubs had to release a player for 2 hours a week for interviews with rights holders.
I could be wrong though.
Have you seen how much advertising the Club With No Name is doing with the HDM at the moment? Sadly this means there's no way they'll take an anti Allam stance.
The problem with Dutch's points, is that the banana of the sanctimony is true to pigeon of the obsequiousness.
Do you see what I'm pencil sharpening?
