Just a thought. Back in the day, not an awfully long time ago, we used to have a certain player with 7 on his back. He had a portly figure, dressed in red (no, not that one) a fair beak on him, and a great footballing gift. However, really quite often, he didn't seem terribly up for it and had a poor game. That continued throughout his career, but we never questioned whether he'd given up. Let's give the kid a break eh?.....
1) three years actually. 2) he repaid the fee back over three years, so why don't we judge Ramirez after that amount of time instead of three months of playing time? Bearing in mind he had a very serious injury.
It was a specualtion buy that we could not afford to make, a safe Premiership of course, not a team with a weak squad for the Premiership. Two quality defenders would of been a wiser buy, keep this post as a receipt to shove back in my face if we fail and I shall gladly have it back.
Bundles of joy and kind people on here, I wonder sometimes are most of the people on here like that fellow in the cardie of the Renault advert who cleans everything.
Fair to say that Ramirez didn't have a good game. Not aided by a poor team performance and dreadful tactics. Nobody had a good game.
Probably still start an argument. I'd hate to see what you could do if someone locked you in a phonebox. Now, **** off GMI.
Oh dear oh dear! Saints today were rubbish. Puncheon looked more like the player of old indecisive, slow of thought and distribution. Their we're other players out of sort and we played poorly and never looked likely to score. Also Mayuka clearly wasn't ready to start. I do wish Gaston would shoot more
