There has been one glaring problem with the manner the Paul Stewart story that broke today has been reported.
For example, the opening line of the BBC's report reads "Former England and Tottenham footballer Paul Stewart has spoken of being sexually abused as a youth player" while the Mirror's front page not only shows Stewart in his Spurs kit, but only refers to Spurs on its front page - as posted below
You must log in or register to see images
To someone with no knowledge of Stewart's career, the logical conclusion to be drawn from these reports is that Stewart was abused during his time at Spurs - even though this is far from the truth as he wasn't playing for Spurs at the time the abuse happened, but not only has this not been made clear, references to him playing for City and Liverpool have been hidden away in the blurb rather than the headlines or sub-heading where Spurs are prominently featured.
It's one thing for journalists to be malicious in reporting whatever bollocks they made up as fact, quite another for them to be so careless in their reporting that the story they print comes across as very different to the one they intended to report.