I can’t stand the bloke but I bet he goes and scores 10-12 goals at Rotherham this season. He can clearly do it, he just didn’t wanna be at SAFC.
He has to get fat first, I meant fit, or did I?
I can’t stand the bloke but I bet he goes and scores 10-12 goals at Rotherham this season. He can clearly do it, he just didn’t wanna be at SAFC.
Reminds me of the story of why Wigan got rid of him, they didn't have the players to play the way/system that suited GriggMore words from Grigg, says he felt it was never going to work here, change of manager and systems.
https://www.sunderlandecho.com/spor...-situation-following-rotherham-switch-3369351
It won't be long until he's blaming the club, the manager and the supporters ...
... the only hat trick he'll ever get.
I don't like our tendency to turn players that haven't done well here in to pantomime villains. Grigg didn't want to be here, he'd rather have been closer to home. You can't force a player to love a club. We should never have signed him in the first place. He's gone now let's forget him.
We're even over the top about players like Chopra. All that stuff about that miss being deliberate is bollocks. He made that up later to keep in with the Mags.
Rodwell is the only one that deserves our ire, due to the fact that he was happy to give up on being a footballer, anywhere. Grigg just wanted to be somewhere else.
If he does mate, I hope the club's got a reply ready. People like him deserve to be shown up for what they are.
Like I said to Clocky, wasn't the rumour that Wigan needed the money for him because they were in trouble?I doubt anyone put his arm up his back and frogmarched him here. If he didn't want to come, he shouldn't have signed the dotted line.
ThisI can’t stand the bloke but I bet he goes and scores 10-12 goals at Rotherham this season. He can clearly do it, he just didn’t wanna be at SAFC.
What do you know.? He's blaming us losing in the play offs and changing managers for his utterly disgraceful form/behaviour
What do you know.? He's blaming us losing in the play offs and changing managers for his utterly disgraceful form/behaviour
Like I said to Clocky, wasn't the rumour that Wigan needed the money for him because they were in trouble?
But moves often don't work out as people hope/think/want, whether that's in football or any other walk of life. Unlike Rodwell, he clearly wanted to play football, as his loan at MK Dons shows.
This is it. No matter which way you look at it, he was a poor signing. An act of vanity by a fella who didn't know what he was doing. That's not really Grigg's fault. He won't be a foot note in our history, we've moved on as a club.If that was the case mate, then it really demonstrates how clueless Donald was. We should have had them by the short and curlies, instead of letting ourselves be dictated to by a club who were desperate for cash. Madness!
Even then, Grigg was under no obligation to agree to the move.
This is it. No matter which way you look at it, he was a poor signing. An act of vanity by a fella who didn't know what he was doing. That's not really Grigg's fault. He won't be a foot note in our history, we've moved on as a club.
No. That's not what I've said at all. He was a poor signing, he should never have been here. A mediocre player for a club like SAFC who's profile was raised beyond what it should have been on the back of a couple of decent seasons and a catchy song. Donald was seduced by that and wasted money on him- not Grigg's fault. By turning him into a figure of hate we continue to give him a falsely inflated profile, beyond what he would otherwise have achieved. He should be nothing to us. Just like my other example, Chopra, who we continue to hate because he claims that he missed on purpose. He didn't. He made that up later to please the Mags. Grigg may come out later, and already has to some extent, and claim that things were awful here for him to increase his exposure. Why feed that by making him a pantomime villain?So you suggest nothing was Griggs fault and we should be less critical ? is that what you are saying.
No. That's not what I've said at all. He was a poor signing, he should never have been here. A mediocre player for a club like SAFC who's profile was raised beyond what it should have been on the back of a couple of decent seasons and a catchy song. Donald was seduced by that and wasted money on him- not Grigg's fault. By turning him into a figure of hate we continue to give him a falsely inflated profile, beyond what he would otherwise have achieved. He should be nothing to us. Just like my other example, Chopra, who we continue to hate because he claims that he missed on purpose. He didn't. He made that up later to please the Mags. Grigg may come out later, and already has to some extent, and claim that things were awful here for him to increase his exposure. Why feed that by making him a pantomime villain?
Not sure where you get the idea I'm giving him any credence. I didn't want us to sign him in the first place and wasn't surprised that it turned out to be a bad move. I only commented on this thread because I think it makes us look silly to hate such an obviously bad signing. You seem determined to pick an argument with me for some reason so I won't comment further on it.Its you that is giving him publicity by trying and failing in my opinion to give the fraudster any credence whatsoever, So you can feed away, I'm done.