Because they are in the business of putting humans into space and most people were suitably impressed the first time .
People are in space as we speak.

Because they are in the business of putting humans into space and most people were suitably impressed the first time .

Maybe to advance scientific studies of the only planet we have ever managed to send people to ever.To prove morons wrong, but that would be a wasted effort as you have already stated.

Maybe to advance scientific studies of the only planet we have ever managed to send people to ever.![]()
The purpose of which would be?
So if they sent people up with HD cameras instead of crappy blurry ones you wouldn't bother watching the footage because we already did it ?It's not a planet. It's "The moon".

To prove morons wrong, but that would be a wasted effort as you have already stated.
Expensive one, too. I can see them going to congress and asking for $30bn to fly to the moon again.
"And why would you want to do that?"
"Well, because some middle-aged virgins living in their parents' basements don't believe we flew there before and we want to prove them wrong"
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/exploration/spacecraft/index_prt.htmExpensive one, too. I can see them going to congress and asking for $30bn to fly to the moon again.
"And why would you want to do that?"
"Well, because some middle-aged virgins living in their parents' basements don't believe we flew there before and we want to prove them wrong"
Before the end of the next decade, NASA astronauts will again explore the surface of the moon

Why would NASA bother going back ?I stand corrected.

They don't build tanks or cars from 50 years ago at Ford because the technology has advanced .
You can still buy new Ford cars though .
NASA spend $20billion a year but gave up on their most successful project because they got bored of sending men to the moon ?
Sounds highly implausible.
So, they're planning on faking another moon landing eh?
Wish you ****s would make up your minds.
Why would NASA bother going back ?
It will be a resounding meh from thrillseekers like you and Stuart![]()
Why would NASA bother going back ?
It will be a resounding meh from thrillseekers like you and Stuart![]()
Maybe to advance scientific studies of the only planet we have ever managed to send people to ever.![]()
Make up your mind you just said it was a pointless waste of money.I would be happy if they went back. Not sure what it would do for the mental health of certain other posters, mind.
^^^and this, ladies and gents, is why we are leaving the EU
Make up your mind you just said it was a pointless waste of money.