So if they sent people up with HD cameras instead of crappy blurry ones you wouldn't bother watching the footage because we already did it ?
Expensive one, too. I can see them going to congress and asking for $30bn to fly to the moon again. "And why would you want to do that?" "Well, because some middle-aged virgins living in their parents' basements don't believe we flew there before and we want to prove them wrong"
Why would NASA bother going back ? It will be a resounding meh from thrillseekers like you and Stuart
I would be happy if they went back. Not sure what it would do for the mental health of certain other posters, mind.
Yeah, but the paper you posted gives a justifiable reason for it so that's fine with me. Plus, it would be worth spending $30bn on it just to annoy Eddie.