Giggs to do one?

Let’s hope it isn’t true

 

Was this the domestic assault he was arrested for a while ago ?

Edit .. just checked and yes it is ...

 

Especially in the guilty until proven innocent age we live in

 

Who did he assault?

Horrible bloke anyway mind you

 

I worked with someone who used to be Ryan Giggs’ partner. He was an abusive, punchy, manipulative **** back then, doubt he has changed much.

 

Really? Might revise my earlier post then

 

I thought you were being sarcastic

I didn’t used to work with anyone he’s lived with but he’s always come across as bloody horrible and what we do know about his relationships seems to confirm that

 

I don’t read the gossip columns den unlike yourself obvs
So can’t say I know much about his personal life
But if you and Al think he’s a **** then I’m prepared to change me view

 

Neither do I, hence me asking what he was supposed to have done domestic violence wise.
Just seems like I wouldn’t want to have a pint with him.
So that’s proof he’s not as pleasant as you.
I rest my case

 

Charges are (1) ABH on his ex-partner, and (2) common assault on another woman in her 20's.

 

Think the answer has already been given but assaulted his girlfriend (or ex) i believe .. didnt realise he'd hit another female .. and given the other charges doesn't bode well. If he is found guilty of throwing his weight around with women i hope they throw the book at him.

 

Has it been said anywhere he hit them? I just thought it was assault, which could be a number of things?

 

I would hope so too but at this point he's simply been charged and as far as I'm aware will plead not guilty.

Maybe he did do it,maybe he didn't,but the Welsh F.A clearly and obviously know the full details and the verdict already and have reacted accordingly??

 

Can’t like that obviously, but cheers

 

ABH implies physical contact doesn't it?

 

Obviously a nice bloke, what with him having shagged his brother's wife...

 

He did say ‘if’
As for his employer the burden of proof for disciplining someone at work (balance of probability) is very different to criminal cases (beyond reasonable doubt) so they don’t need to know all the details to start a process and suspend him / put him on gardening leave (which this sounds like)