But judging by his stats it seems he was a key part of the teams success, so its a bit harsh to say it was all down to players like Hazard and Sow.
we all know were not getting him i think he will sign for you lot but i dont know why you need him you need a striker if any and a right back we have a good player who you can take off our hands he's called james perch future talent!!
HA HA I must have missed these classic pearls of wisdom from you Jayram. So basically your claiming that Gervinho has scored less goals than Higuain/Benzema because he's played for smaller clubs!?? In poorer leagues!?? Think about what your saying mate.
Stop talking out of your arse sweetheart. I'm superior to you in every possible way. Oh and I like how you have completely dodged the issue AGAIN.
You have to remember that this is the same Jayram who used to be on 606 every matchday slating Arsenal, telling us how we were going to lose during matches, and then dissapearing when he was made to look foolish. If we do buy him, no doubt Jayram will be the first to jump on Gervinhos back when he struggles.
I haven't seen anything of Gervinho so I freely admit I'm not in a position to judge. I find it hard to believe though that he has less composure than Walcott who could be arguably the most uncomposed player in the history of the game. Either way, if he's as good as Chamakh, then I'll be pleased. I suspect he might be even better though.
Your just a troll Jayram, I'm here to discuss football. Something you evidently have no ****ing idea about. Now back to the actual topic at hand. I believe it was Gervinho.
I would like to hear more about your theory on Gervinho scoring less goals than Higuain/Benzema because he's played for smaller clubs and in weaker leagues. Its pretty ****ing off the wall.
Jesus it all got a bit serious on here didnt it? you boys ever considered decaffinated? might wanna give it a try
i think gervinho is ****e and not because of the teams his played but becuase i think his ****e and not worthy of the arsenal!
