She's backed down with his say so. That's a terrible mistake imo.
What she should've done is gone to court and given evidence against him.
The defence lawyer takes her evidence apart and she crumbles claiming it was all a lie.
The crowd in the gallery cheer. Mason walks out a free and innocent man.
The way they've done it is just amateur and stupid, I want him out the club.
Before or after she initially repeated it in court? Just wondering if she'd only be charged with making a false allegation and wasting police time (serious offence and get a record but probably not going to jail) or whether she'd also have made it look proper by perjuring herself and getting a prison sentence to boot.
