Match Day Thread General matchday thread.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Tobes said:
No he didn’t in fairness. If he was being pulled back or fouled at the point of the offside I’d understand that interpretation, but he was offside ran through and was then fouled. Meh.
Click to expand...

That's why I thought you were wrong...but that's why the offside law is a mess. 2 different interpretations and both valid...should simply be a factual decision like goal line technology imo.
 
NSIS said:
So, overall you saw about as much as I did...
Click to expand...


I watched the whole match up to the point when, 20 minutes from the end, I had to leave to go to work. You said earlier that you had barely watched the game.

I know you are opinionated, but clinging stubbornly to opinions on games you haven't watched, or books you haven't read, is a bit strong even by your standards.
 
****ing buzzing with that result, Jose would have lost that one.

Nice little Acca in as well at 30/1.

Cheers Rom, six ton to spend tonight <cheers>
 
Archers Road said:
I watched the whole match up to the point when, 20 minutes from the end, I had to leave to go to work. You said earlier that you had barely watched the game.

I know you are opinionated, but clinging stubbornly to opinions on games you haven't watched, or books you haven't read, is a bit strong even by your standards.
Click to expand...


I didn’t say I barely watched it, I said I didn’t watch all of it.

I gave an opinion on what I saw, which was about 2/3 of the game overall.

I do not give opinions on games, films, books I haven’t seen or watched.
 
NSIS said:
I didn’t say I barely watched it, I said I didn’t watch all of it.

I gave an opinion on what I saw, which was about 2/3 of the game overall.

I do not give opinions on games, films, books I haven’t seen or watched.
Click to expand...


But if you did, they'd probably be the best opinions in the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NSIS
West WindsR said:
What are the two interpretations? There’s only one I know of and he was slightly off.
Click to expand...

That kane had not touched the ball and so the assistant ref did not raise the flag...happens dozens of times in a game...so a player who is clearly offside as the ball goes towards a team mate, ends up scoring as the ball rebounds at their feet off a defender or keeper...phases of play and stuff.

If kane hasn't touched the ball he does not get flagged as being offside so penalty is given.

To my mind offside is offside when the player offside touches the ball...the phases of play causes chaos and weird arse decisions imo.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back