Match Day Thread General matchday thread.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Agreed mate. Glad you agree that it's essentially the same outside of the time scales.

So all City trophies post 2008 are tainted and all Arsenal ones lost 1920.

Glad we came to agreement bru.
Whatever makes the pep cuckolds feel better mate.

Btw.

A cuck is a bloke who watches another man **** his wife and shakes his hand after.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE
Whatever makes the pep cuckolds feel better mate.

Btw.

A cuck is a bloke who watches another man **** his wife and shakes his hand after.

Fair enough, bit weird that. Is it a Yank or political term as I've never seen it other than on here?

Not sure what Pep has to do with my discussion with Pinkie.
 
The city statement lmfao

On challenging the voting rules for the prem, 14 teams to make a decision ect

Reason fir challenge....
" the tyranny of the majority"

Abbi dabbi beheadings soon me thinks<laugh>

The tyranny of the majority <laugh>

So I'm guessing 5 against Citeh (guess who? <laugh>) ... and the rest, who are constrained by the current FFP farce from being able to compete on a level playing field with those clubs, either abstaining or standing with Citeh <whistle>
 
Last edited:
I hate all this **** but just an observation that the posters who's clubs are in trouble for breaking the rules seem to be the most vocal on this subject.

Just saying.

... they would be ...

...the Big 5 other than Citeh were able to flash the cash with no limits to build the clubs that they are today... you just aren't allowed to do that now because that would be unfair and against the spirit of the same clubs winning the trophies ... can't have that now can we? <laugh>
 
Fair enough, bit weird that. Is it a Yank or political term as I've never seen it other than on here?

Not sure what Pep has to do with my discussion with Pinkie.
Its a pornhub term bro<laugh>


And i only named pep to explain Cuckold

Peej backing citys cheating and suing of the prem is for example a cuckold move
 
Y'all werent even a football league club before you bribed your way in.
And Abramovich was over 20 years ago, so I ask again, whats the statute of limitations on it?

Yeah we were lol

The whole league structure had been disbanded because of World War I. When it started up again Arsenal were included in the new top flight as it was expanded to 22 teams, so it included us after a vote about who should be included. Spurs fans only bring it up coz they are ****ty they didn't get the place, but they were relegated in the last season before the War, along with your lot.

But Chelsea got a place in the top flight too, despite being relegated. So maybe you should be looking at your own club's bent promotion <laugh>

As for Roman, he wanted to buy Spurs lol. He only got sloppy seconds Chelsea so pumped his rubles into your lot. Arbitrary success that could have gone to the Yiddos instead lol. The only reason FFP exists is because your yo-yo club bent the rules out of all shape lol
 
... they would be ...

...the Big 5 other than Citeh were able to flash the cash with no limits to build the clubs that they are today... you just aren't allowed to do that now because that would be unfair and against the spirit of the same clubs winning the trophies ... can't have that now can we? <laugh>
Shame these rules wetnt i place back the 50s then eh

Cos wed have no issue then.

But we do have rules in place, rules that city have broken 115 times.

Happy to explain for your slow mind
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE
But you didn't initially did you? You're the only premier league club who didn't win promotion via their results on the pitch. Your place was gained by your financial clout rather than your on pitch success which means you had a huge unfair advantage. This is absolutely fact mate and not up for debate.

Which is the point. You constantly argue that City's success is meaningless due to it all being caused by questionable funding - which is more than a reasonable point for what it's worth imo.

But isn't Arsenal exactly the same? Without buying your way to the top division you wouldn't have been in a position to win the league titles you did which increased your stature.

What's the difference exactly?

No mate, Chelsea were promoted after the war too, despite being relegated before the league was disbanded.

I'm not saying the way those clubs were voted into the top flight was right. But the league was expanded, so it was never going to be decided on top finishing positions alone. Arsenal have remained in it ever since and yeah you can argue that they were given an advantage in the first place.

But over a century of staying in that league without ever being relegated suggests that we've earned our place in it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FadgewackeR
No mate, Chelsea were promoted after the war too, despite being relegated before the league was disbanded.

I'm not saying the way those clubs were voted into the top flight was right. But the league was expanded, so it was never going to be decided on top finishing positions alone. Arsenal have remained in it ever since and yeah you can argue that they were given an advantage in the first place.

But over a century of staying in that league without ever being relegated suggests that we've earned our place in it.

Fair enough mate. That's pretty reasonable to me.

So out of interest how many more years do City have to wait until they've proven their worth?