General Matchday Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Never a pen that.

Oil club in generous penalty decision shocker

He's a total **** that mariner, **** knows how he keeps his place on the PL, he's ****ing clueless, simply doesn't understand the game
 
City should be down to 10 after that challenge on Distin or the boot In Barry's head so the **** Mariner gives them a soft pen Instead?
 
We are doing ****all In the final third AGAIN frustrating as hell...You can see a runner but whoever gets the ball Insists on backwards or ****ing sideways!!
 
Barry's had a ****ing shocker here

Tobes, as I can't comment on the United board (who the **** moved the thread there?), I obviously meant over the 'move', as that was that the gangster allegations were about.
 
Didn't look a pen to me, but I had to laugh at the reasonings of Fat Sam. He started off saying that there was no contact, but when Redknapp proved that there was (though never enough for a pen, imho) the Face of Boe changed his tack to "the referee could never have seen that": Andy Grey's favourite escape route when he was wrong too, even to the point of saying that the referee shouldn't have been looking when it was proved that he did.
 
Didn't look a pen to me, but I had to laugh at the reasonings of Fat Sam. He started off saying that there was no contact, but when Redknapp proved that there was (though never enough for a pen, imho) the Face of Boe changed his tack to "the referee could never have seen that": Andy Grey's favourite escape route when he was wrong too, even to the point of saying that the referee shouldn't have been looking when it was proved that he did.

Sam is a ****ing beauty tho :emoticon-0102-bigsm
 
Didn't look a pen to me, but I had to laugh at the reasonings of Fat Sam. He started off saying that there was no contact, but when Redknapp proved that there was (though never enough for a pen, imho) the Face of Boe changed his tack to "the referee could never have seen that": Andy Grey's favourite escape route when he was wrong too, even to the point of saying that the referee shouldn't have been looking when it was proved that he did.
Redknapp had to go on super slo mo and enhance the image to see even the faintest of contact

He's a ****ing melt that bloke, I'd love to spark him
 
Redknapp had to go on super slo mo and enhance the image to see even the faintest of contact

He's a ****ing melt that bloke, I'd love to spark him

Well, I'll say again that I didn't think it was anything like a pen, though Redknapp did prove, as Milner kept saying, that he didn't dive. I'll also not say that City deserved to win anyway overall, therefore you can't argue against a dodgy decision, as that was the same argument you used about Cahill's handball at Anfield last month.
 
Well, I'll say again that I didn't think it was anything like a pen, though Redknapp did prove, as Milner kept saying, that he didn't dive. I'll also not say that City deserved to win anyway overall, therefore you can't argue against a dodgy decision, as that was the same argument you used about Cahill's handball at Anfield last month.

I never said he dived. Only contact does not equal a foul. Thanks to whoppers like Redknapp some appear to confuse the two these days.

City only forced Howard into 1 save of note btw, exactly he same as. Hart at the other end. Plus the decision directly handed them the points, unlike at Anfield, so your desperation to link the 2 has failed I'm afraid
 
I never said he dived. Only contact does not equal a foul. Thanks to whoppers like Redknapp some appear to confuse the two these days.

City only forced Howard into 1 save of note btw, exactly he same as. Hart at the other end. Plus the decision directly handed them the points, unlike at Anfield, so your desperation to link the 2 has failed I'm afraid


Not linking the two decisions - the City one was merely wrong: the Anfield one was utterly appalling - I was simply contrasting, not linking, your assertion that the Chelsea one was okay as they were the better team, but the City one was not. Btw, the score was 1-2 at Anfield with 6 minutes left, so how the hell did the decision not to award the most blatant penalty this season not 'directly hand' Chelsea two points?
 
Not overly confident about tonight's game v QPR we haven't been playing well anyone know If Naismith Is back we could do with someone who actually tries to make runs forward?
 
Not overly confident about tonight's game v QPR we haven't been playing well anyone know If Naismith Is back we could do with someone who actually tries to make runs forward?

Have to miss tonight as I can't get away from work early enough