First time in history that there are more people in the cabinet who were born in Sunderland than went to Eton.
Result
Result
You must log in or register to see images
Maybe they assumed that Labour were going to win it anyway, so didn't bother voting?I realy have not paid much attention to this election.
I've jusr read this ----
The premier appointed the Cabinet last night after the extraordinary scale of his victory - achieved despite Labour receiving fewer votes than under Jeremy Corbyn in 2017 - became clear
IF true, thats a remarkable statistic.
As a generalisation we can ASSUME that the disgruntled middle of the road Tories voted for The Liberals, while the unhappy Right went for Reform. Protest votes on a grand scale.
Bt where did the missing Labour supporters go? And WHY?
I realy have not paid much attention to this election.
I've jusr read this ----
The premier appointed the Cabinet last night after the extraordinary scale of his victory - achieved despite Labour receiving fewer votes than under Jeremy Corbyn in 2017 - became clear
IF true, thats a remarkable statistic.
As a generalisation we can ASSUME that the disgruntled middle of the road Tories voted for The Liberals, while the unhappy Right went for Reform. Protest votes on a grand scale.
Bt where did the missing Labour supporters go? And WHY?
It is akin to wanting to change the rules of football because your team lost.I'm not getting this narrative that Labour won with a very low share of the vote.
We all knew the rules before the election. We have (for centuries) had a first past the post system. No-one complained
when the Tories won a landslide in the last election, or when Thatcher won a landslide in 1979. The system is what it is until its changed.
To them ends, I simply cannot see the two major Parties agreeing to go down the proportional representation route with the prospect of letting the likes Farage get an even bigger grip in the House of Commons... Thats like turkeys voting for Xmas.
We’d have had PR now if the Lib Dems had made it a red line for joining with the Tories.I'm not getting this narrative that Labour won with a very low share of the vote.
We all knew the rules before the election. We have (for centuries) had a first past the post system. No-one complained
when the Tories won a landslide in the last election, or when Thatcher won a landslide in 1979. The system is what it is until its changed.
To them ends, I simply cannot see the two major Parties agreeing to go down the proportional representation route with the prospect of letting the likes Farage get an even bigger grip in the House of Commons... Thats like turkeys voting for Xmas.
Just my opinion.. but it’ll never happenWe’d have had PR now if the Lib Dems had made it a red line for joining with the Tories.
I get what you’re saying. I agree Turkeys won’t vote for Christmas.Just my opinion.. but it’ll never happen
I realy have not paid much attention to this election.
I've jusr read this ----
The premier appointed the Cabinet last night after the extraordinary scale of his victory - achieved despite Labour receiving fewer votes than under Jeremy Corbyn in 2017 - became clear
IF true, thats a remarkable statistic.
As a generalisation we can ASSUME that the disgruntled middle of the road Tories voted for The Liberals, while the unhappy Right went for Reform. Protest votes on a grand scale.
Bt where did the missing Labour supporters go? And WHY?
Do we still need to keep hearing about Boris fooking Johnson now Labour are in government?
Let’s just look to the future and hope Starmer does well.

Was about to post this myselfFirst time in history that there are more people in the cabinet who were born in Sunderland than went to Eton.
Result
You must log in or register to see images
Was about to post this myself
I'm not getting this narrative that Labour won with a very low share of the vote.
We all knew the rules before the election. We have (for centuries) had a first past the post system. No-one complained
when the Tories won a landslide in the last election, or when Thatcher won a landslide in 1979. The system is what it is until its changed.
To them ends, I simply cannot see the two major Parties agreeing to go down the proportional representation route with the prospect of letting the likes Farage get an even bigger grip in the House of Commons... Thats like turkeys voting for Xmas.
I get what you’re saying. I agree Turkeys won’t vote for Christmas.
I was thinking that you could go half way. Double the size of the constituencies and have 350 local representatives and 300 PR ones. May give voice to the millions who don’t have one at present.
Its all well and good, but in the first instance you have to get past "self interest" and I say, the 2 big Parties wouldn't let it happen.I like this in theory. It would take some working though, for MP's to manage a constituency twice the size and to decide what the 300 PR ones do if they don't have a constituency.
More paid lackeys for the former? I wonder how much footfall they actually deal with? But with the latter (thinking on me feet) if you had even numbers of FPTP and PR MPs you could double up on the MPs per constituency. Get them assigned at random so it becomes a true vocation? Albeit they’ll probably all gravitate to Westminster and the highly subsidised bars and restaurants :-DI like this in theory. It would take some working though, for MP's to manage a constituency twice the size and to decide what the 300 PR ones do if they don't have a constituency.
More paid lackeys for the former? I wonder how much footfall they actually deal with? But with the latter (thinking on me feet) if you had even numbers of FPTP and PR MPs you could double up on the MPs per constituency. Get them assigned at random so it becomes a true vocation? Albeit they’ll probably all gravitate to Westminster and the highly subsidised bars and restaurants :-D

Its all well and good, but in the first instance you have to get past "self interest" and I say, the 2 big Parties wouldn't let it happen.