brb - the incident to which I refer was not the move for the goal.
It was a conventional counter attack. The Gills player ( who was out of position ), made a pathetic attempt to get back -- I reckon I could have 'walked' faster !........... I'm not saying that he would have got back in time -- but it was the lack of effort -- giving up without trying -- not acceptable................ and therefore it is no surprise that none of our players put in enough effort to intercept 1 of the 25 opportunities that was presented before the ball enters the net.
Your video shows some nice passing by Ipswich -- but not one Gills player getting really 'stuck in.' -- everyone backs off - the ball gets crossed - O'Connor and or Bonham could have prevented the goal -- but the lack of intensity in our style of defending resulted in neither player being sharp enough.
Things improved in the 2nd half (( like I said, I do greatly appreciate the effort after half time )) -- but the damage had been done.
The lack of 'engagement' in the first half is the responsibility of Mr.Evans. Perhaps he would have noticed - if he wasn't too busy arguing with Lambert.
What makes this even sadder is go and read the Ipswich Town comments online, anywhere you like. I checked out their main one's along with video blogs and the responses were, we are pleased with the win but the performance needs to improve! Depite it only being 0-1 we were never concerned.
So they are top of the league and think they could have done better. Well we can't really do much worse from our perspective, 25 opportunitites to stop the ball being walked in the net.
If we lose at Oxford, then it's time for Evans to walk. That as Gills Pegleg has pointed out is exactly how long maddog was given.

