For or against?

[4tiger]

1

 

[tigercity]

1

 

[AlRawdah]

1.

 

[HHH]

1

 

[McGregor HU5]

2

 

[Lincoln Tiger]

1

 

[PLT]

1

 

[BillyBobBallbag]

2

 

[City1904]

1.

 

[Amin Arrears]

1 and a half. It's **** but it's not the end of the world. Guess that makes me 2.

 

[Timatkirkwall]

2

 

[over18and legal]

I apologise for not posting this in the name change thread but it would go to the back of 60+ pages and just get lost.
I think many of us would like to know what the consensus of opinion of fellow 606's is regarding the name change.
Therefore I propose a simple poll where people only answer the single question below and only with one of the 5 listed answers and nothing else.
If we do it this way we may be able to get a realistic idea of numbers for or against the name change, so please do not give a reason for your answer, express any opinions whatsoever and only answer with one of the 5 options given. If we do it this way the question and answers will not get lost in pages of endless debate and arguments,

This same poll has been used by Hull City Southern Supporters (hcss) to find which answer represents the majority opinion amongst its members.

Question: Which of the following best represents your view of the proposed name change from Hull City AFC to Hull Tigers?

1. I'm strongly opposed to the name changing
2. I'm opposed to the name change but not strongly
3. Neither opposed nor in favour/no view either way
4. I'm in favour of the name change but not strongly
5. I'm strongly in favour of the name change


Remember answers only (chosen from above) and nothing else.

1

How many regular posters are on here?
I will say 50 tops. Even if they all say yes, that is 50 out of 20k season passes. So, that would be a guaranteed 1 in every 400 opposed to the change.
I am not quite sure what this is trying to prove due to the sample being too small.

 

[HFFP]

1.

 

[castleparktiger]

1

 

[kccircle]

Ridiculous thread - peer pressure is key here.

To work threads like these need to be anonymous


My answer is purely subjective by the way

 

[RicardoHCAFC]

1 and a half. It's **** but it's not the end of the world. Guess that makes me 2.

I've got a similar split between 1 and 2 depending on whether it's based on principle or on what we know.

On the basis of what has been presented I'd be a 1.
but on the principle I'm open to the possibility in the right circumstances so I'd be a 2.

 

[ellewoods]

What Ricardo says. So I am also somewhere between a 1 and a 2.

 

[x]

1. no peer pressure on me.

 

[Dr.Stanley O'Google, HCFC]

1. I'm strongly opposed to the name changing

 

[hu7tiger]

1