What do you think the club needs money for if as, according your earlier reply to me, we won't spend money on transfers rather than can't. If we won't it wouldn't matter how much we had.
Also not sure why you're worried that we won't know to look out for the loan if as you say SD has freely admitted to taking it out.
How much do you think it cost to shift Catts and Oviedo? how has that been funded and is it included in the projected £5m profit.
I do appreciate the fact that you have isolated this issue in it's own thread
re: the first part, I'm saying that the reason we currently 'won't' is because Donald and co are intent on making us sustainable in league one above all else, which is mental given that we have a huge window of opportunity to get straight out of this league, and it would take an incredibly negative person to not think that it was worth pushing as hard as possible to maximise our chances.
Now I agree that we don't want to risk too much, but I'm suggesting that a small investment could provide the big boost, weaken rivals, and push us on to automatic promotion. Why won't they spend anything? Not even £100k has gone on transfer fees, I'm sorry, but from reading up on FFP at the weekend, I believe that he is entitled to put money into the club this year and not break FFP, because it counts as revenue.
The answer is almost certainly that the profit this year can help offset a loss next year once the parachute payments run out, but it's SUNDERLAND ffs

We aren't meant to become a sustainable league one club, we're supposed to have an owner who will get us into the Championship with a budget that outstrips the rest of the division. Instead, we're basically saying we'll give up on our window of opportunity.
All of which would be far more palatable if we weren't down at least £20m in cash that should be in the bank for us right now, and Donald hadn't used the bulk of another loan in April to pay off Ellis Short for his own private benefit. How can anyone look at that and think 'you know what, actually, I'm quite happy for us to spend nothing on players, because Stewart Donald will make a massive profit if he sells the club with shares that the club bought for him'

Madness.
Referring to Rodders, Oviedo, Catts etc - those guys' contracts were already on the books as liabilities, so paying them off early or over a longer time is of benefit to the club. I think Chodders got a settlement, so he got paid less than he would have got had he just seen out the year but was released and got to double dip, so a net gain to the club despite the waste, as we would have paid the full amount before.
With Oviedo and Catts, someone may have exact details, but I believe in Cattermole's situation, he was released immediately in return for paying his contract over two years rather than one, so in effect, reducing the liability per year to 20k a week (£1m) rather than paying all £2m this season (which I suspect may have been partly motivated by FFP, although I believe there is a clause for players who signed deals a substantial period before relegations). We don't know the terms of the Oviedo deal, but whatever deal was struck would simply have meant paying him less in some way or form.
Whatever happened, you can be certain of one thing: it didn't 'cost' to shift them, it will end in a net saving, even if just on this year's books.