BREAKING
You must log in or register to see images
: Frank Lampard is expected to be named as Norwich manager, talkSPORT understands [HASHTAG]#NCFC[/HASHTAG]
You must log in or register to see images
I don't think SW does 'star struck' or is looking for a 'brand'. The whole point in having a SD is to leave these decisions to an expert, who then takes it to the management team and if they agree it is referred on to the board. I don't feel strongly one way or the other as all three candidates are fully capable IMO. I'm willing to trust the system we've set up. Here's David Freezer's view:Until this happened, I had no idea how much I didn't want Lampard to be our next manager.
Getting star-struck and chasing a name (sorry, *brand*). It seems so much against everything Norwich stand for.
I don't think SW does 'star struck' or is looking for a 'brand'. The whole point in having a SD is to leave these decisions to an expert, who then takes it to the management team and if they agree it is referred on to the board. I don't feel strongly one way or the other as all three candidates are fully capable IMO. I'm willing to trust the system we've set up. Here's David Freezer's view:
“Looking increasingly likely that the next NCFC head coach will be a Premier League legend with 106 England caps – but with plenty to prove as a manager. Lampard has seemed to be leading the way from the start, could well provide the inspiration factor for this City squad,”
I have to admit I wasn’t for Lampard to begin with and would have preferred Favre if we could have got him, but in the last couple of days I have started to see the sense it could make.OK, so if it isn't the 'name', why does Lampard get the job? His England caps are irrelevant as a predictor of his managerial abilities, and nothing he did at either Derby or Chelsea justify taking him on. Even if Favre and Knutsen turned us down, there are other guys out there with a far better track record than Lampard as a manager. I didn't want Smith, but at least he has done something to justify being chosen in his time with Brentford and Villa.
The Edwards link could be the reason for the delay in announcing as negotiating with Chelsea now could take a few days.According to TeamTalk:
"Norwich deliberately looked for someone with an attacking philosophy not dissimilar to Farke’s. Lampard fits their criteria and they will be hoping he provides the subtle changes needed to spark a reaction."
If true, that would seem to me what Webber would be looking for and if he feels Lampard fits the criteria then so be it. I do also feel that Lampard's stature in the game could be an important factor with a mixed squad of British and overseas internationals, though I deeply hope we don't get labelled 'Lampard's Norwich'.
If not Jody Morris:
"According to a recent report from journalist Simon Phillips, Lampard’s impending appointment could see Chelsea’s assistant coach, Joe Edwards, follow suit. Lampard and Edwards have worked together before and are also good friends."
https://www.caughtoffside.com/2021/11/11/chelsea-set-to-lose-key-backroom-staff-member/
Given that we have gained 5 points from the last 5 games it could be argued that we have moved on from the disrupted pre-season and brutal early schedule. A fair test would be to compare how the new manager does over the next five matches.I'd bet on Frank not doing any better points wise than Farke has done. My money is on <20.
So why jump to the conclusion that they've gone against "so much of everything they stand for" in this instance? As Rick says, being star-struck and indulging in name chasing are the last things anyone would seriously attribute to Webber.Getting star-struck and chasing a name (sorry, *brand*). It seems so much against everything Norwich stand for.
Excuse me, Duncan, there's only one Doom Goblin. Anyone else is a pale imitationThe new guy hasn't even been appointed but some doom goblins have already written "them " off .

In a class of your own, Robbie!Excuse me, Duncan, there's only one Doom Goblin. Anyone else is a pale imitation![]()

So why jump to the conclusion that they've gone against "so much of everything they stand for" in this instance? As Rick says, being star-struck and indulging in name chasing are the last things anyone would seriously attribute to Webber.