Off Topic Fallout 606
- Thread starter Lord Jonjomort
- Start date
- Status
Not got many reads so far, but here are my thoughts so far:
Neville: I know I'm town and if I understand the rules properly (which seeing as they were far too short I almost certainly don't) I think I am fairly safe tonight anyway.
Sebb: Much quieter than usual. Is usually more vocal when he is town - problem is not always. One to keep an eye on.
Chaos: I'm not even going to attempt to read him
Gerrez: Probably town. I think the saved statement would be a silly move in the long run, but this isn't certain. Well down my list of suspicion.
Biscan (klipperty): Don't know - always plays the same game guilty or innocent.
Musty: Not sure he has even posted yet.
ACS: Much more sedate than usual. Not sure what to make of this yet.
Mitrosexual: Hasn't posted much. Didn't in last game either when he was town, but previously always had a lot to say.
Brb: See Chaos!
Mikey: Hasn't posted much but made some good points when he did. No real read but leaning town.
Nolberto: Did a Mick Harford and left before he'd even arrived - Dead Town.
Tash: Cannot see past his admission that he hadn't chosen to go to the saloon but ended up there anyway. Almost certainly a synth and saved by someone as a wind up last night.
Valley: Has posted without really contributing. No read but nothing constructive raises suspicion. Nothing definite though.
Style: His move to subtley get the Sheriff to out himself set alarms bells off in my head. Probably the one I am most suspicious of after Tash. Also jumped on the chance to suggest I need to be lynched tonight without actually voting . Could be innocent but could also be a good mafia/synth move to drop something in there that would be forgotten when we went back and looked at voting patterns later in the game.
RHC: Dogmeat. The only confirmed Town player so far (partly his own fault for not investigating last night
Definite Town
Tobes: Always complaining that he never makes it to day 2 and then hardly posts anything except votes for Gerrez. He was always going to vote for Gerrez though when Astro isn't playing so could be nothing.
Tennis: Lots of constructive posts but was keen to keep the votes close even after Tash's apparent mistake. There are lots of things about that that make sense - but could also have been a subtle attempt to distract attention away from a team mate. Slight suspicions.
In Summary: I haven't got a ****ing clue!!
Until I see what morning brings - NO VOTE
Neville: I know I'm town and if I understand the rules properly (which seeing as they were far too short I almost certainly don't) I think I am fairly safe tonight anyway.
Sebb: Much quieter than usual. Is usually more vocal when he is town - problem is not always. One to keep an eye on.
Chaos: I'm not even going to attempt to read him
Gerrez: Probably town. I think the saved statement would be a silly move in the long run, but this isn't certain. Well down my list of suspicion.
Biscan (klipperty): Don't know - always plays the same game guilty or innocent.
Musty: Not sure he has even posted yet.
ACS: Much more sedate than usual. Not sure what to make of this yet.
Mitrosexual: Hasn't posted much. Didn't in last game either when he was town, but previously always had a lot to say.
Brb: See Chaos!
Mikey: Hasn't posted much but made some good points when he did. No real read but leaning town.
Nolberto: Did a Mick Harford and left before he'd even arrived - Dead Town.
Tash: Cannot see past his admission that he hadn't chosen to go to the saloon but ended up there anyway. Almost certainly a synth and saved by someone as a wind up last night.
Valley: Has posted without really contributing. No read but nothing constructive raises suspicion. Nothing definite though.
Style: His move to subtley get the Sheriff to out himself set alarms bells off in my head. Probably the one I am most suspicious of after Tash. Also jumped on the chance to suggest I need to be lynched tonight without actually voting . Could be innocent but could also be a good mafia/synth move to drop something in there that would be forgotten when we went back and looked at voting patterns later in the game.
RHC: Dogmeat. The only confirmed Town player so far (partly his own fault for not investigating last night
Definite TownTobes: Always complaining that he never makes it to day 2 and then hardly posts anything except votes for Gerrez. He was always going to vote for Gerrez though when Astro isn't playing so could be nothing.
Tennis: Lots of constructive posts but was keen to keep the votes close even after Tash's apparent mistake. There are lots of things about that that make sense - but could also have been a subtle attempt to distract attention away from a team mate. Slight suspicions.
In Summary: I haven't got a ****ing clue!!
Until I see what morning brings - NO VOTE
Not got many reads so far, but here are my thoughts so far:
Neville: I know I'm town and if I understand the rules properly (which seeing as they were far too short I almost certainly don't) I think I am fairly safe tonight anyway.
Sebb: Much quieter than usual. Is usually more vocal when he is town - problem is not always. One to keep an eye on.
Chaos: I'm not even going to attempt to read him
Gerrez: Probably town. I think the saved statement would be a silly move in the long run, but this isn't certain. Well down my list of suspicion.
Biscan (klipperty): Don't know - always plays the same game guilty or innocent.
Musty: Not sure he has even posted yet.
ACS: Much more sedate than usual. Not sure what to make of this yet.
Mitrosexual: Hasn't posted much. Didn't in last game either when he was town, but previously always had a lot to say.
Brb: See Chaos!
Mikey: Hasn't posted much but made some good points when he did. No real read but leaning town.
Nolberto: Did a Mick Harford and left before he'd even arrived - Dead Town.
Tash: Cannot see past his admission that he hadn't chosen to go to the saloon but ended up there anyway. Almost certainly a synth and saved by someone as a wind up last night.
Valley: Has posted without really contributing. No read but nothing constructive raises suspicion. Nothing definite though.
Style: His move to subtley get the Sheriff to out himself set alarms bells off in my head. Probably the one I am most suspicious of after Tash. Also jumped on the chance to suggest I need to be lynched tonight without actually voting . Could be innocent but could also be a good mafia/synth move to drop something in there that would be forgotten when we went back and looked at voting patterns later in the game.
RHC: Dogmeat. The only confirmed Town player so far (partly his own fault for not investigating last night
Tobes: Always complaining that he never makes it to day 2 and then hardly posts anything except votes for Gerrez. He was always going to vote for Gerrez though when Astro isn't playing so could be nothing.
Tennis: Lots of constructive posts but was keen to keep the votes close even after Tash's apparent mistake. There are lots of things about that that make sense - but could also have been a subtle attempt to distract attention away from a team mate. Slight suspicions.
In Summary: I haven't got a ****ing clue!!
Until I see what morning brings - NO VOTE
Where the **** did I say the sheriff should out himself?
I suggested he should investigate someone, not really the same is it?
You suggested he should be the one to investigate me so that he could tell everyone the result. It was the implication and what it would have meant that raised suspicion. Like I said, could have been totally innocent or could have been a very clever move in the hope the sheriff gave away enough clues about his identity, without it actually having your fingerprints on it.
RHC does the barking. I'm just shaking the tree and seeing what falls out - and seeing how people react.
No need to move suspicion - we'll know 100% in the morning anyway when investigation results are out - provided RHC remembered to send his PM tonight that is 
Sebb is a liar, a cheat and a devious trickster not to be trusted. Believe me.
Vote for Sebb.
- May 22, 2011
- 73,786
- 25,711
- 113
Think I've been the most helpful and put the link of Tash together... only for him to randomly be saved though
Yes you have. The problem is you are so hard to read that this is the sort of help you still manage to look like you're providing when you're not town
You're not on my suspicious list though! (Not sure if that is a good thing or a bad thing considering some of the mistakes I've already made though
)
No Brotherhood, no Raiders, no super mutants, Enclave or Talon? Characters drafted in from the Mojave. No vaults, no wasteland. A focus on synths who aren't common to the DC Ruins at the time these characters lived(that rare they're perceived as a myth in that part of America), they're common in the Commonwealth(fallout 4). Pots of gold instead of Caps. Was gutted I was going to miss this but not too fussed now. Far too mismatched.
We'll have to wait for the morning report to see whether there's any useful info in there.
Don't see the point in voting Tash again since I'm assuming that the Lone Wanderer will save him again if he was up for lynching.
I can only think he IS the lone wanderer, he looked so guilty yesterday and still has not provided a decent explanation for how he ended up in the Saloon night 1. But the Lone Wanderer has no teammates who could have told him that Tash is innocent (every townie is flying blind essentially and can only rely on their own ability to provide info), so either he just had a gut feel that Tash is innocent, or he's just screwing around. If that's the case there are a few prime candidates of who it could be
So either
A) Tash is Lone Wanderer (most likely reason, however doesn't explain how he 'wandered' into the saloon night 1), or
B) Tash is not the L.W. but the real L.W. thought he must be innocent based on gut feel (not based on any evidence/abilities so very risky), or
C) Tash is not the L.W. but the real L.W. thought he might be guilty but let's screw with town anyway and save him (prime candidates for L.W. would then be one of the few, shall we say, 'out of the box thinkers'.).
So I won't be voting for Tash today as it's likely he'll be saved by the LW again, will wait for the Three Dog bulletin to see what happened first.
Don't see the point in voting Tash again since I'm assuming that the Lone Wanderer will save him again if he was up for lynching.
I can only think he IS the lone wanderer, he looked so guilty yesterday and still has not provided a decent explanation for how he ended up in the Saloon night 1. But the Lone Wanderer has no teammates who could have told him that Tash is innocent (every townie is flying blind essentially and can only rely on their own ability to provide info), so either he just had a gut feel that Tash is innocent, or he's just screwing around. If that's the case there are a few prime candidates of who it could be
So either
A) Tash is Lone Wanderer (most likely reason, however doesn't explain how he 'wandered' into the saloon night 1), or
B) Tash is not the L.W. but the real L.W. thought he must be innocent based on gut feel (not based on any evidence/abilities so very risky), or
C) Tash is not the L.W. but the real L.W. thought he might be guilty but let's screw with town anyway and save him (prime candidates for L.W. would then be one of the few, shall we say, 'out of the box thinkers'.).
So I won't be voting for Tash today as it's likely he'll be saved by the LW again, will wait for the Three Dog bulletin to see what happened first.
Not got many reads so far, but here are my thoughts so far:
Neville: I know I'm town and if I understand the rules properly (which seeing as they were far too short I almost certainly don't) I think I am fairly safe tonight anyway.
Sebb: Much quieter than usual. Is usually more vocal when he is town - problem is not always. One to keep an eye on.
Chaos: I'm not even going to attempt to read him
Gerrez: Probably town. I think the saved statement would be a silly move in the long run, but this isn't certain. Well down my list of suspicion.
Biscan (klipperty): Don't know - always plays the same game guilty or innocent.
Musty: Not sure he has even posted yet.
ACS: Much more sedate than usual. Not sure what to make of this yet.
Mitrosexual: Hasn't posted much. Didn't in last game either when he was town, but previously always had a lot to say.
Brb: See Chaos!
Mikey: Hasn't posted much but made some good points when he did. No real read but leaning town.
Nolberto: Did a Mick Harford and left before he'd even arrived - Dead Town.
Tash: Cannot see past his admission that he hadn't chosen to go to the saloon but ended up there anyway. Almost certainly a synth and saved by someone as a wind up last night.
Valley: Has posted without really contributing. No read but nothing constructive raises suspicion. Nothing definite though.
Style: His move to subtley get the Sheriff to out himself set alarms bells off in my head. Probably the one I am most suspicious of after Tash. Also jumped on the chance to suggest I need to be lynched tonight without actually voting . Could be innocent but could also be a good mafia/synth move to drop something in there that would be forgotten when we went back and looked at voting patterns later in the game.
RHC: Dogmeat. The only confirmed Town player so far (partly his own fault for not investigating last night
Tobes: Always complaining that he never makes it to day 2 and then hardly posts anything except votes for Gerrez. He was always going to vote for Gerrez though when Astro isn't playing so could be nothing.
Tennis: Lots of constructive posts but was keen to keep the votes close even after Tash's apparent mistake. There are lots of things about that that make sense - but could also have been a subtle attempt to distract attention away from a team mate. Slight suspicions.
In Summary: I haven't got a ****ing clue!!
Until I see what morning brings - NO VOTE
There goes Nev planting the seeds across the group....... with a scattergun
Tonight I'd like to vote Neville for the lynch please.
Yes you have. The problem is you are so hard to read that this is the sort of help you still manage to look like you're providing when you're not town
You're not on my suspicious list though! (Not sure if that is a good thing or a bad thing considering some of the mistakes I've already made though
^^ ^^ ^^
Beelin'
S
Super G Ted'inho
Guest
We'll have to wait for the morning report to see whether there's any useful info in there.
Don't see the point in voting Tash again since I'm assuming that the Lone Wanderer will save him again if he was up for lynching.
I can only think he IS the lone wanderer, he looked so guilty yesterday and still has not provided a decent explanation for how he ended up in the Saloon night 1. But the Lone Wanderer has no teammates who could have told him that Tash is innocent (every townie is flying blind essentially and can only rely on their own ability to provide info), so either he just had a gut feel that Tash is innocent, or he's just screwing around. If that's the case there are a few prime candidates of who it could be
So either
A) Tash is Lone Wanderer (most likely reason, however doesn't explain how he 'wandered' into the saloon night 1), or
B) Tash is not the L.W. but the real L.W. thought he must be innocent based on gut feel (not based on any evidence/abilities so very risky), or
C) Tash is not the L.W. but the real L.W. thought he might be guilty but let's screw with town anyway and save him (prime candidates for L.W. would then be one of the few, shall we say, 'out of the box thinkers'.).
So I won't be voting for Tash today as it's likely he'll be saved by the LW again, will wait for the Three Dog bulletin to see what happened first.
The LW could make this game last bloody ages!
Sebb is a liar, a cheat and a devious trickster not to be trusted. Believe me.
Vote for Sebb.
Can someone pick up Obi's dummy for him as he can't get out of his pram!!
- Status