Experiment

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
If steel never buckled under intense heat from fire then there would be no need to fireproof it then would there, Eddie?

Unfortunately for the twin towers the fire proofing was blown off (ooh err missus) by the blast from the hologram bombs.

WTC7 however??? :eek:
 
If steel never buckled under intense heat from fire then there would be no need to fireproof it then would there, Eddie?

Unfortunately for the twin towers the fire proofing was blown off (ooh err missus) by the blast from the hologram bombs.

WTC7 however??? :eek:

There can't have been much heat from all the Jet Fuel and combustable materiel in the offices, it's not as if all the paper and wooden furniture could have contributed to the flames.
 
80% of the jet fuel burned outside the building within 10 seconds, fireproofing away from the impact zone would be unaffected

even with zero fireproofing, the top might fall off, the whole building doesnt fail in a split second after an hour of mild fires in the upper 20% of the building
I want to know who measured 80% of the flames and who had the stopwatch timing it
 
  • Like
Reactions: DevAdvocate