Everything LUST

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Still don't really know what to make of LUST to be honest. I'm all for supporters having part ownership of a club and a bit of a say in how it's run.

But since they formed, they haven't really gained much momentum recently have they? That's even after meetings with the new owners etc. I think maybe fans are starting to realise that we should leave GFH to continue the decent work so far, albeit slow progress, which I personally prefer anyway.
 
glory hunter 2013/14 said:
Soppy bollocks. You need people who understand hi finance not cultured footballers running football clubs. If Lucas has the ability then fine otherwise the last thing we need is a celebrity figurehead. We have had enough problems when someone who is supposed to be a businessman and was supposed to have a clue didn't run the show properly.

We either want a slow turn around as I feel we are getting now, or to be taken over by someone ( not an anonymous collection of mystery men) who has the cash and desire to invest in the product and buy us into the prem.
Click to expand...
Don't agree. Nothing wrong with having people involved in the running of the club that have a love for it. rather that than journeymen managers and players who couldn't give a ****. We've had our fair share of those. Add to that owners who admit themselves, they didn't know first thing about running a football club and the jury is still out on that one
 
Eireleeds1 said:
Don't agree. Nothing wrong with having people involved in the running of the club that have a love for it. rather that than journeymen managers and players who couldn't give a ****. We've had our fair share of those. Add to that owners who admit themselves, they didn't know first thing about running a football club and the jury is still out on that one
Click to expand...

Fairy nuff
 
JonnyLosAngeles said:
I was a big fan of LUST.

They promised to reveal documentation relating to a spat they had with David Heigh during the TO due diligence by GFH.

I was still waiting, now given up on them.

Sorry
Click to expand...
Cannot for the life of me, see what it would achieve by rocking the boat at this time. General consensus among everyone, Lust, fans, gfh, management and players that everyone needs to be pulling in the same direction. Surely any revelations from LUST now regarding our current owners would be only counter productive
 
Off the pitch we seem to be going along nicely at the moment, slowly but surely righting the wrongs. We don't really need this new, unsettling speculation. That Radebe is supposedly involved is negated by the fact Adam Pearson is supposedly involved too. A takeover of sorts for a majority purchase of £7M isn't worth the hassle and the disruption it would potentially have on the playing side.
I'd rather have Noorruddin, Haigh and Patel steadying the ship for the moment even if they don't have a vast amount of money to invest on the playing side. They and McDermott seem to have a good working relationship, and having less money is in a way giving more of our young development squad players a chance of breaking through.
LUST need to stop meddling and attempting to introduce Micky Mouse investors, GFH are more than capable of doing that themselves. In my opinion there really is no need for LUST anymore, we have the supporters club already in LUSC.
LUST should be thanked for their part in ridding us of Bates, but they've served their purpose now, there's no more for them to do.
 
GFH say it's bollocks.
It can't be bollocks again can it?

Of course it can. Fat fook was on the tele saying who lust were involved. I think we can now be sure it's bollocks. He just wants a seat on the board without buying it.

For me LUST always was a bag of ****e but with GC anywhere near it, with the exception of his civil partner WJ and the self righteous brother the rest of you must be coming to the same conclusion?
 
glory hunter 2013/14 said:
GFH say it's bollocks.
It can't be bollocks again can it?

Of course it can. Fat fook was on the tele saying who lust were involved. I think we can now be sure it's bollocks. He just wants a seat on the board without buying it.

For me LUST always was a bag of ****e but with GC anywhere near it, with the exception of his civil partner WJ and the self righteous brother the rest of you must be coming to the same conclusion?
Click to expand...
Did GC run away with your woman or drive over your cat? You hide your dislike of him quite well though
 
The day LUST buy into Leeds is the day I walk away ... GC is nothing more than a thick idiot ... their diabolical behaviour in the past shows they lack intelligence, have no tact or business nous ... they can get LOST as far as I'm concerned ... it will be the biggest blunder ever made by Leeds ... I truly believe they will be worse than Bates, there will have to be the promised "transparency" which won't fully materialise, expect lots of public spats with supporters and agents/players ... I really don't want LUST to have anything to do with Leeds because they don't represent me and are nothing more than another supporters club branch with limited membership ... the day they can show 75000 signed up members I'll say fair enough, but that will never happen ... think about it, in the days of Bates the club still managed to sell 50000 club memberships, imagine what that will be in the Prem, don't need LUST ... leave our club to proper owners with a stake ... it won't be long before the "investor" going 50/50 with LUST will want a healthy return, then what ... they sell to some unsavoury character and we are heading backwards again ... no thanks, LUST is still just a handful of idiots working for THEMSELVES and their OWN SELF IMPORTANCE ... glory hunters who need to fcuk off back to their miserable lives and leave the club alone ... nothing but trouble if this actually happens.
 
This has certainly got my day off to a good start (in Florida plus long lie-in!). What a bunch of self-richeous, sanctimonious gits. What's it like up there on the moral high ground? I just love it when the uneducated present opinions as fact - repeatedly, in fact. Now it's a mantra. Does anyone actually know what the difference is between LUST & the RSCs? Obviously not. Perhaps you should get a little education yourselves before spouting off. As for GC, has anyone ever spoken to the man, to determine if the reality matches their fantasies about him? no. Didn't think so! So much for MOT.
 
Whitejock said:
This has certainly got my day off to a good start (in Florida plus long lie-in!). What a bunch of self-richeous, sanctimonious gits. What's it like up there on the moral high ground? I just love it when the uneducated present opinions as fact - repeatedly, in fact. Now it's a mantra. Does anyone actually know what the difference is between LUST & the RSCs? Obviously not. Perhaps you should get a little education yourselves before spouting off. As for GC, has anyone ever spoken to the man, to determine if the reality matches their fantasies about him? no. Didn't think so! So much for MOT.
Click to expand...


While we march on together fat fooker would be in the support bus eating all the biscuits. Is he slipping you any cash for all this pr you do for him?

Perhaps before he goes to sleep tonight your pillow talk could include who is lying this time him or GFH, when GFH say there is no bid from Lucas and the Hull based consortium. Plus ask him if he would turn down a seat on the board should gfh be stupid enough to offer one.
 
glory hunter 2013/14 said:
While we march on together fat fooker would be in the support bus eating all the biscuits. Is he slipping you any cash for all this pr you do for him?

Perhaps before he goes to sleep tonight your pillow talk could include who is lying this time him or GFH, when GFH say there is no bid from Lucas and the Hull based consortium. Plus ask him if he would turn down a seat on the board should gfh be stupid enough to offer one.
Click to expand...

You seem to bang on about his weight all the time. Does that mean that being fat is bad. Guess a lot of our support is bad by your standards, then. What other preduices do you have?

One other thing - I do not do PR for LUST. I simply question and challenge inaccurate propogandists like yourself to back up what you say with facts. To a man, all have so far failed to do so. You simply pose questions, answer them yourselves, and then convert your answers into facts that suit your agenda. What have LUST done to annoy you so much? You're like a terrier with a rag doll, thinking you're somehow under threat. Some might even call it delusional. Perhaps you need counselling? Did a fat Leeds supporter touch you as a child, perhaps? Must be something to generate this outporing of rage.
 
Whitejock said:
You seem to bang on about his weight all the time. Does that mean that being fat is bad. Guess a lot of our support is bad by your standards, then. What other preduices do you have?

One other thing - I do not do PR for LUST. I simply question and challenge inaccurate propogandists like yourself to back up what you say with facts. To a man, all have so far failed to do so. You simply pose questions, answer them yourselves, and then convert your answers into facts that suit your agenda. What have LUST done to annoy you so much? You're like a terrier with a rag doll, thinking you're somehow under threat. Some might even call it delusional. Perhaps you need counselling? Did a fat Leeds supporter touch you as a child, perhaps? Must be something to generate this outporing of rage.
Click to expand...

Ok leaving on one side absorb allots weight issues for now.

Gfh say there is no takeover on the table. Your glorious leader says there is. We know who lied last time, who lies this time?

BTW my rage is largely poetic licence. I am more frustrated by your willingness to swallow everything lust spout without question than the utterings of a good if overweight self publicist.
 
glory hunter 2013/14 said:
Ok leaving on one side absorb allots weight issues for now.

Gfh say there is no takeover on the table. Your glorious leader says there is. We know who lied last time, who lies this time?

BTW my rage is largely poetic licence. I am more frustrated by your willingness to swallow everything lust spout without question than the utterings of a good if overweight self publicist.
Click to expand...

Knowing me as you do from this blog, do you really thing I'd accept anything without question? That's why I go to LUST meetings, and am quite vocal when it comes to asking questions. So I get to hear both sides, and make up my own mind. But you don't attend, and don't ask questions of LUSt. You ask questions here, then answer them yourself, as if it was fact. Try going to a meeting & ask your questions there. Then you can truly voice any concerns you may have. Seems so little effort to get to the heart of it. Perhaps you prefer your cowardly & damaging approach?
 
Whitejock said:
Knowing me as you do from this blog, do you really thing I'd accept anything without question? That's why I go to LUST meetings, and am quite vocal when it comes to asking questions. So I get to hear both sides, and make up my own mind. But you don't attend, and don't ask questions of LUSt. You ask questions here, then answer them yourself, as if it was fact. Try going to a meeting & ask your questions there. Then you can truly voice any concerns you may have. Seems so little effort to get to the heart of it. Perhaps you prefer your cowardly & damaging approach?
Click to expand...

My approach could only be damaging if I am right.
If the damage I do means we don't end up with lust anywhere near the boardroom it will be worth it.
The problem about asking questions is that people lie.
Given that lust misrepresent the size of their mandate why would I as a non believer allow them to pretend that they have another follower by going to another GC publicity roadshow. He makes Ridsdale look shy and retiring.

So when it comes out there is no Radebe based TO will you come back and say GC bullshitted?
 
glory hunter 2013/14 said:
My approach could only be damaging if I am right.
If the damage I do means we don't end up with lust anywhere near the boardroom it will be worth it.
The problem about asking questions is that people lie.
Given that lust misrepresent the size of their mandate why would I as a non believer allow them to pretend that they have another follower by going to another GC publicity roadshow. He makes Ridsdale look shy and retiring.

So when it comes out there is no Radebe based TO will you come back and say GC bullshitted?
Click to expand...

Ridiculous answer. Why don't you man up & shout them down at a public meeting? Answer? You're just a whining keyboard warrior. And using your methods, that is now confirmed and absolute fact.
 
Whitejock said:
Ridiculous answer. Why don't you man up & shout them down at a public meeting? Answer? You're just a whining keyboard warrior. And using your methods, that is now confirmed and absolute fact.
Click to expand...

Nice swerve WJ.

GC said on the tele on Saturday there was a take over bid in the table. GFH say there isn't. When he is shown to be (let's be kind here and not say being a lying Cnut) mistaken will you see him for what he is?

The proof isn't defined what is said at a meeting of acolytes but in what actually happens. You know like lust not introducing GFH to cuddly Ken.
 
glory hunter 2013/14 said:
Nice swerve WJ.

GC said on the tele on Saturday there was a take over bid in the table. GFH say there isn't. When he is shown to be (let's be kind here and not say being a lying Cnut) mistaken will you see him for what he is?

The proof isn't defined what is said at a meeting of acolytes but in what actually happens. You know like lust not introducing GFH to cuddly Ken.
Click to expand...

I'm over in Florida, so can't ask him the question. Please remember that GFH have been very clever with their wording in the past - this is not an opinion - it's published fact! So why is it LUST telling all the lies? To paraphrase your earlier statement "I am more frustrated by your willingness to swallow everything GFH spout without question. I believe the required term is 'touché'.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back