Off Topic EU deabte. Which way are you voting ?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

How will you vote in the EU referendum ?


  • Total voters
    74
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think we've put with too much for too long.
Unemployment was low, the GBP was strong, interest rates were low, property prices were strong (not good for people trying to get on the ladder but neither is increased unemployment). All of that will be up in the air for a couple of years because of some misguided belief that we needed to seize back our country NOW.

Just think it was a very daft thing to do. Voluntary economic suicide as the Washington Post accurately called it.

Oh well, apparently we'll be able to have straight bananas soon?!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peter Saxton
We believe it's hyped and exaggerated by the remain camp. Not denying that attacks have gone up, not agreeing with any of it, either. It's wrong and doesn't do our/my aim, any good.
Then you're denying reality and more concerned with the reflection of racism on the way you chose to vote, as opposed to a genuine concern as to the fact that hate crime has increased since the result.

For shame
 
Wasting your time with this one. Just let him think he's right, it's much easier <laugh>

You said it was the remain campaign who were putting the information out there. It wasn't it was the Chief constable of Avon and Somerset Police.
You were wrong. You seem to want to dress it up as some kind of smear campaign against the leave voters, but that is your prejudice speaking. It is simply a fact that the Police provided and gave their own comment on.
 
There he goes the standard Dutch vacuous deflect post.

Attempt to patronise - check
Attempt to belittle - check
Attempt to avoid the obvious unpalletable reality that he's been made to look a complete **** again - check

You're as predictable as a Kopite in pre season.

You keep answering a different point to the one I raised.

I can only assume you've realised and are trying to deflect it or you're a thick ****, or most likely both, <ok>
 
How can I be providing the information to a wider audience when it's already in the public domain ?
Think of it like this. Not everybody reads the website where you got it from. Not everybody reads any other websites the information is on. You inform somebody else. Bingo! It reaches a wide audience.
You ask me anymore questions with obvious answers and I'm sure I'll be able to answer them for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
We believe it's hyped and exaggerated by the remain camp. Not denying that attacks have gone up, not agreeing with any of it, either. It's wrong and doesn't do our/my aim, any good.
The Daily Mail aren't in the Remain camp. Far (right) from it. Their coverage may be apologetic for the perpetrators but even they are reporting it.
 
Think of it like this. Not everybody reads the website where you got it from. Not everybody reads any other websites the information is on. You inform somebody else. Bingo! It reaches a wide audience.
You ask me anymore questions with obvious answers and I'm sure I'll be able to answer them for you.

The story has been all over the national news.
 
Unemployment was low, the GBP was strong, interest rates were low, property prices were strong (not good for people trying to get on the ladder but neither is increased unemployment). All of that will be up in the air for a couple of years because of some misguided belief that we needed to seize back our country NOW.

Just think it was a very daft thing to do. Voluntary economic suicide as the Washington Post accurately called it.

Oh well, apparently we'll be able to have straight bananas soon?!!
And you believe all the doom merchants?.... we shall see
 
Status
Not open for further replies.