So why only mention WHITE slave owners? Why not say "slave owners"?
If I said "white teachers" or "white accountants" you would wonder why I was bring race into it.
I refer you to the post you've just quoted.
So why only mention WHITE slave owners? Why not say "slave owners"?
If I said "white teachers" or "white accountants" you would wonder why I was bring race into it.
Exactly I was referring to the post that only mentioned white peopleI refer you to the post you've just quoted.
They came over and stole the white man's job!
Exactly I was referring to the post that only mentioned white people
It was the whiteman that for a brief period stole the job of slavery that the north Africans have done for centuries. They were one of the biggest hurdles that Wilberforce had to cross.

You don't understand it do you. We are supposed to criticise white people and say black people can do no wrong. In some quarters reality doesn't exist.It was the whiteman that for a brief period stole the job of slavery that the north Africans have done for centuries. They were one of the biggest hurdles that Wilberforce had to cross.
Ahhh so the white man was actually saving them! My bad![]()
What a peculiar twist of logic. Where do I even imply they saved them? You seem to think slavery as only bad when white people do it. Whole villages vanished from these islands, taken as slaves. That was wrong too.
Who said it did? I dont think anybody said that two wrongs make a right. We just pointed out that it would be more accurate to acknowledge that black people were slave owners as well.Yes it was but it doesn't absolve what was happening in the U.S. and is completely irrelevant to the point Piskie made. That's the real twist of logic right there from you and Peter lol.
Yes it was, but it doesn't absolve what was happening in the U.S. and is completely irrelevant to the point Piskie made. That's the real twist of logic right there from you and Peter lol.
What is the twist of logic?Yes it was, but it doesn't absolve what was happening in the U.S. and is completely irrelevant to the point Piskie made. That's the real twist of logic right there from you and Peter lol.
What is the twist of logic?
There's no twist of logic.
they are both perfectly logical statements.
He struggles with his logic. I dont think he'll be able to come up with a sensible answer. He's one of those people who just goes from one ridiculous statement to another. Maybe he's still wondering whether or not I want freedom of movement in any deal with the EU!?You'll have to be patient waiting for a reply, he's currently on the Liverpool board trying to drum up some support.
Kind of ironic, given how much the slave trade contributed to Liverpool's growth.
http://www.not606.com/threads/your-vote-counted.330147/page-137#post-9428796
He struggles with his logic. I dont think he'll be able to come up with a sensible answer. He's one of those people who just goes from one ridiculous statement to another. Maybe he's still wondering whether or not I want freedom of movement in any deal with the EU!?
Summary of the thread in emoticons.
![]()
It's nuts on here, like dogs barking at each other.![]()
I'm watching a repeat of Peston on Sunday.
Teresa May has just said that she's the daughter of a vicar and she's a practising Christian.
Custard won't like that as he doesn't like anyone who believes in pixies in the sky.
Just to clarify, it's not just Muslims he doesn't care for. Christians, Jews...you're all the same as far as Custard is concerned.
I'm watching a repeat of Peston on Sunday.
Teresa May has just said that she's the daughter of a vicar and she's a practising Christian.
Custard won't like that as he doesn't like anyone who believes in pixies in the sky.
Just to clarify, it's not just Muslims he doesn't care for. Christians, Jews...you're all the same as far as Custard is concerned.