He knows something....
He does correct it in his full text. He's probably referring to who'd be doing the trading, not who we'd be subsidising with the money. He knows something....
He does correct it in his full text. He's probably referring to who'd be doing the trading, not who we'd be subsidising with the money. There you go again! Everybody else's opinion, particularly when it doesn't agree with your own, is moronic.
It's blind ignorance and arrogance to assume you're always right. But that doesn't seem to bother you one bit.
The scenario I portrayed is a perfectly feasible one, and what I believe will happen.
Try Cameron!...
But, don't worry. Boris has said he won't run for PM
That was last week. WE are now in a Conservative Party leadership contest. The Labour Party doesn't seem to do Leaders.WTF are you on about??
The Brexit vote was seen by many as a private battle for supremacy between Cameron and Johnson. Two Old Etonians.
All clear now?
And where is the pound now??
That was last week. WE are now in a Conservative Party leadership contest. The Labour Party doesn't seem to do Leaders.
So somebody says something that is very clear and you get confused and try to claim what my "inference" was!? Just read what I say. Think about it and understand. Don't come up with something totally different to what I said and then criticise me for your lack of basic understanding.Your inference was that all Londoners had a lack of knowledge compared to people from outside London. I am surprised that anyone in an economics class, from London, did not at least have some knowledge about Milton Keynes. That is outside London.
Whoa, you've changed your tune, after calling everyone ****wits yesterday. What you wrote was moronic nonsense; try coming back to me with why it wasn't and you might prove your point, but I very much doubt it. The scenario you portrayed is as realistic as Game of Thrones.
There you go again! Everybody else's opinion, particularly when it doesn't agree with your own, is moronic.
It's blind ignorance and arrogance to assume you're always right. But that doesn't seem to bother you one bit.
The scenario I portrayed is a perfectly feasible one, and what I believe will happen.
He's in SW19.You really are in your own little world, aren't you?!
Do you recall that bit of ongoing volatility we discussed earlier? Carney's was a keynote speech and markets have made an immediate reaction, they will recover tomorrow - I believe the late timing of his speech was deliberate. Much ado about almost nothing in the scale of things. You seem very desperate to prove your point.
By the way, this wasn't everyone else's opinion, it was yours, no one else's name is on it except yours. Why do you hide behind everyone else?
Because what I portrayed is a very valid and likely future scenario. You just happen disagree with it. Fine, disagree.
Btw, it's moronic to accuse those who have opinions other than your own of being moronic!

And you know they'll recover tomorrow??
As it happens, it may a little as positions are flattened over a 'long weekend'
I'm not hiding at all. You're an idiot if interpret it that way. Believe it or not, and for you it may be difficult, there are people other than me who disagree with you!!
Overnight?So overnight we're going to find replacements for nearly half our exports in markets that we already trade in?
Do you have a carer?
It's moronic because it makes no sense. It is out of touch with what the EU hierarchy are saying. they are saying this will not happen, Merkel has said this will not happen, yet you insist it is a valid future scenario. It is an opinion that is based on nonsense, disproven and unfounded facts, yet you insist it is credible - that makes it moronic. Deal with the changing scene and keep up with the comments that say you are wrong. You really are ****ing stupid.![]()
Oh yes there are!!...

Overnight?
So you haven't been aware of the two year period after invoking article 50 before we leave the EU?
You don't seem to have a clue what is going on.