Off Topic EU deabte. Which way are you voting ?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

How will you vote in the EU referendum ?

  • Total voters
    74
Status
Not open for further replies.
Treble said:
The overwhelming weight of evidence for Churchill wanting a European Union can't be argued with unless you're just being pigheaded.

He went as far as saying he advocated a United States of Europe which I'm sure is further than any of us would like to go.

The point being missed here is it completely dispells the myth that by spouting Churchill's name you have some shared mindset that England should stand alone or that you are any more patriotic <ok>
Click to expand...
But if your opinions are based on absolutely **** all apart from a dislike of foreigners then he makes for a cracking avatar.
 
Actually its fact that the EU accounts haven't passed its audit but mainly because they don't have control of where the money goes completely once they past some of it back to the countries. Another thing is that i think there is a much lower tolerance level to misappropriated funds (think its normally higher for normal audits, from what i've read).

Here's a good message from someone whos a leading economist

You must log in or register to see media
 
Sir Stan said:
It's amazing how many lies are hoovered up and rabidly regurgitated by the Outers. It's like a cult!
Click to expand...

Same with the Inners and the PM is the biggest twat of them all.

I wonder what will happen when/if the MPs vote on the referendum after an exit vote because if they refuse to listen to the people I can see lots of civil unrest
 
BobbyD said:
Actually its fact that the EU accounts haven't passed its audit but mainly because they don't have control of where the money goes completely once they past some of it back to the countries. Another thing is that i think there is a much lower tolerance level to misappropriated funds (think its normally higher for normal audits, from what i've read).

Here's a good message from someone whos a leading economist

You must log in or register to see media
Click to expand...
Is this the guy who is based in the Isle of Man for tax reasons so doesn't get a vote? Close pal of Farage.
 
Mr Custard said:
Do you know why he did that and its nothing to do with cheap labour
Click to expand...
according to the ever unreliable wiki - "in February 2000 Dyson threatened to shift focus from his Malmesbury plant to a new plant set up in Malaysia because the government would not join the euro."

also "James Dyson mentioned that the market was largest in New Zealand, Australia, Japan and potentially in the Far East market, and therefore the decision to shift production to Far East was driven by the need to get closer to the consumer base. As Dyson was the major manufacturing company in Wiltshire, outside Swindon, this move created some controversy as trade unionists claimed that the move would impact the local economy hard."

also "In the following year, washing machine production was also moved to Malaysia.The move was driven by production costs in Malaysia which are lower by 30% compared with the UK, however it created a loss of 65 jobs."
 
Sir Stan said:
according to the ever unreliable wiki - "in February 2000 Dyson threatened to shift focus from his Malmesbury plant to a new plant set up in Malaysia because the government would not join the euro."

also "James Dyson mentioned that the market was largest in New Zealand, Australia, Japan and potentially in the Far East market, and therefore the decision to shift production to Far East was driven by the need to get closer to the consumer base. As Dyson was the major manufacturing company in Wiltshire, outside Swindon, this move created some controversy as trade unionists claimed that the move would impact the local economy hard."

also "In the following year, washing machine production was also moved to Malaysia.The move was driven by production costs in Malaysia which are lower by 30% compared with the UK, however it created a loss of 65 jobs."
Click to expand...

Top bit is wrong second bit is right, but also the government would not do a grant on new premises up north.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back