Starmer is a traitor to the British public. all sections of it, and his numerous swerves to try and please everyone have only ignited fear and hatred, in more enlightened times his head would be on a stake for the unrest he has created
Election 2024
- Thread starter brb
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Starmer is a traitor to the British public. all sections of it, and his numerous swerves to try and please everyone have only ignited fear and hatred, in more enlightened times his head would be on a stake for the unrest he has created
Well there are plenty of other reasons, but the fools who voted for it will never admit they were mugged off; instead, they double down on flag shagging nonsense. So here we are stuck with the consequences, and the horrifying prospect of the gurning spiv who dedicated his life to Brexit, getting the keys to Downing Street.
I actually voted to stay, but only because I did not want the first ten years of my retirement ****ed up by ****s in the EU proving for all time that they are Totally Worthless ****S, and bless them they proved me right
Last edited:
Yeah as I understand it, the lower % regions are putting their asylum seekers in hotels. Whereas the higher % areas are finding them homes. What sort of homes, is anyones guess (prefabs?).
However, I thought migrants came under dispersal orders which meant they were not meant to be grouped together, which hotel accomodation does, whether that's due to a lack of housing in comparison I don't know, I can only assume so.
I know Kent always use to take the children, as they require more professional care, hence the cost is higher, I don't know where those children are dispersed to within the county though. Surely not hotels. Genuine children I'm chatting here.
Some areas have more migrants than they are supposed to be allowed per capita, Hounslow and Hillingdon as examples. So unlikely those areas will be receiving anymore. Not sure if per capita feels right, what about density as in amount of land?
I think the higher % areas housing asylum seekers will probably see that situation get worse as migrants are moved out of hotels under this Labour government, I forget what their timescale was on it. So it's like a double edged sword for housing them.
So in other words, unless the North stops finding them homes, you got more coming your way mate.
Last edited:
That's cos the whole world is being arse raped by unrestrained oligarchs, from New York to London to Moscow via Dubai and Hong Kong and Singapore.
Brexit is merely adding extra dogshit chutney to the UK's particular ****-sandwich.
So what ye saying is none of this matters anyway so who gives a ****
Hey ... we saved 'are' fish ... was well worth it ...
... well apart from it now being much more expensive to sell it in the markets that we've always sold it in ... partly because the vast majority of Brits never look past Cod & Haddock for fish consumption
I put this up a while back…Yeah as I understand it, the lower % regions are putting their asylum seekers in hotels. Whereas the higher % areas are finding them homes. What sort of homes, is anyones guess (prefabs?).
However, I thought migrants came under dispersal orders which meant they were not meant to be grouped together, which hotel accomodation does, whether that's due to a lack of housing in comparison I don't know, I can only assume so.
I know Kent always use to take the children, as they require more professional care, hence the cost is higher, I don't know where those children are dispersed to within the county though. Surely not hotels. Genuine children I'm chatting here.
Some areas have more migrants than they are supposed to be allowed per capita, Hounslow and Hillingdon as examples. So unlikely those areas will be receiving anymore. Not sure if per capita feels right, what about density as in amount of land?
I think the higher % areas housing asylum seekers will probably see that situation get worse as migrants are moved out of hotels under this Labour government, I forget what their timescale was on it. So it's like a double edged sword for housing them.
So in other words, unless the North stops finding them homes, you got more coming your way mate.
You must log in or register to see images
One family have been turfed out of the village now because some people paid these ****s a home visit.
This used to be a village with no crime. It was these asylum seekers that changed all of that. Now people are angry. If they send anymore here, it won’t end well for them.
The local kebab shop was raided and a few of them escaped out the back, they were running across the roofs and jumping into peoples back yards to escape. Next night, two lads went in with balaclavas and smashed the place up.
We need a big deportation program. These rats are offering nothing to the local area apart from crime and a refusal to integrate. **** them all.
I thought I saw on the news very recently that Scotland have begged Westminster not to send them anymore. I assume that Scotland were actually housing them, and they eventually realised like parts of England there is no where left to house them, they've run out of homes.
Need to start building the prefabs on all that spare land down in Cornwall for the refugees, some nice rocks to look at as an added bonus.
More seriously the infastructure can't take the strain, it couldn't take the strain before the refugees arrived. All this new housing that we will be slinging up under Labour, will not have much additional infastructure built around it.
A tongue in cheek way of looking at it is you can only empty so many bins for free, how much waste is generated by 30,000+ migrants a year alone will be in hundreds of tons, look at the state of Birmingham, when the infastructure starts to fall apart.
All we have left is sticky plasters in the generosity box.
Last edited:
I thought I saw on the news very recently that Scotland have begged Westminster not to send them anymore. I assume that Scotland were actually housing them, and they eventually realised like parts of England there is no where left to house them, they've run out of homes.
Need to start building the prefabs on all that spare land down in Cornwall for the refugees, some nice rocks to look at as an added bonus.
More seriously the infastructure can't take the strain, it couldn't take the strain before the refugees arrived. All this new housing that we will be slinging up under Labour, will not have much additional infastructure built around it.
A tongue in cheek way of looking at it is you can only empty so many bins for free, how much waste is generated by 30,000+ migrants a year alone will be in hundreds of tons, look at the state of Birmingham, when the infastructure starts to fall apart.
All we have left is sticky plasters in the generosity box.
BBC Breaking News
The Thought Police have intercepted a post on a football forum where a moderator of all people is posting far right messages to incite riots
Herr Starmer stated these extremists cannot be tolerated and must be exterminated at once
The Deputy Dictator Mr Blobby has detached a squad of Daleks to carry out Herr Starmers orders with the permission of the Ultra Woke Dr Who
Further news to follow
Long live our glorious leader Herr Starmer
Woah look at that
Cornwall ahead of Gillingham for supporting asylum seekers
Who’d have thunk it
Gillingham is a small town
Cornwall is a whole county
I realise you are an Arsenal supporter but even you must see the futility of your attempt at a humours post
Stand in the corner with your dunces hat on
Your post only mentioned Gillingham, and the South West is a bigger area than the South East, the South East probably includes London where they are all living in 3 Star Hotels and the figures only refer to those living in houses etc not hotels
The chart shows the areas for the South West and South East, and the South West leads ahead in terms of housing asylum seekers. The geographical area might be bigger, but it's probably vastly smaller in terms of population. But as brb pointed out it's probably housing rather than hotels.
Anyway, the reference to Gillingham was tongue in cheek aimed at brb as he's got Cornwall down as a KKK stronghold lol. It wasn't really meant for anything other than a bit of banter.