I think the greater issue her for future freedoms and, more so nationstates making their own decisions, is the growth of AI and the fact that only two nations on the ****ing planet are actively working on this stuff, the US and China. They have a complete monopoly over one of the most powerful modern day inventions.
Whilst AI doesn't do great at everything, it's ability to crunch data, self improve and rapidly grow is concerning, we have no answer to it. What pisses me the most off about the UK is that we sell EVERYTHING, if we did develop a growing AI company in only 5 years if would be another American owned one. We haven't got an answer to it.
My tinpot theory, mark my words: UK the 51st state.
I just don’t see the need for digital ID. You already need ID like a passport, driving license or birth certificate to gain lawful employment in the UK. So if you’re trying to stop immigrants from working, then most of those who are doing so illegally, aren’t going to be looking for this type of employment and will still go into door drops, barbers, food and hospitality and cash in hand jobs.
I just see the potential pitfalls, both accidental like data breaches and deliberate hacking, and its potential to be abused by future overreach. When you tie in digital technology with face recognition and digital access to finances etc, it’s not a far fetched scenario to see somebody either abusing that power from a political perspective or from a cyber attack to steal your ID and your money.
Also as you mention about AI and the tech industries controlling the narrative. Who’s to say that ****in Elon won’t be able to call the shots over somebody like the US president in the future.
Like you, he is a basically a card carrying fascist
