She even talks like a real leader. Get her in.
You must log in or register to see images
But I like balance
So it’s also worse because of me
She even talks like a real leader. Get her in.
You must log in or register to see images
True. When you have your bad days my posting power and popularity drags it back up. Team effort bro.But I like balance
So it’s also worse because of me
Bit racist mateGet her in what?
In the bin imo.
Bit racist mate
I like her. She’s no Boris but definitely better than the rest of the Tories in the last decade or so.Her is not useless because her is black.
Her is just a world class idiot.
I like her. She’s no Boris but definitely better than the rest of the Tories in the last decade or so.
goodIt's more ****ish because of you. Not saying better or worse, just more ****ish.


definitely my tip for next year's celebrity death listThe homelessness charity Centrepoint has said it will cut ties with its celebrity ambassador Sharon Osbourne after she expressed support for a far-right rally being organised by Tommy Robinson.
![]()
Centrepoint to cut ties with Sharon Osbourne after she backs Tommy Robinson rally
Homelessness charity distances itself after Osbourne says she plans to attend far-right ‘unite the kingdom’ marchwww.theguardian.com
Anyway, the bit that surprised me was that I didn't realise Centrepoint were behind the Omaze campaign, done well for them that...
The charity expressed its gratitude to Osbourne for supporting its Omaze campaign, which raised money by selling entries for a sweepstakes-style draw to win a £5m home overlooking Lake Windermere along with £250,000 in cash.
Apparently (allegedly) the guy Starmer sacked to save his own skin is making a statement confirming Starmer knew every detail of how much Mandeleson failed the Security Checks BUT chose to ignore them to give his best"friend" the jobI think Starmers problem is he promised when he came into office he was going to clean up politics, and on his watch this has happened and it sounds even worse when you say you didn't know, like who the **** is in charge then.
I personally don't want to see him go but I'm sort of like thinking here, do the cops need to get involved, especially if someone has done something underhand.
Starmer stated back in February on live tv the checks had been done, he's on camera actually defending Mandelson's appointment as such due to those checks. Which now it turns out were failed.
Will he have to go I don't know but everyone of the other parties will now put that pressure on him.
I had a suspicion this was the case, from what I gather Starmer will make his statement to the House on Monday, but the guy he sacked his going to sit before the Commons commitee on Tuesday and give his version of events.Apparently (allegedly) the guy Starmer sacked to save his own skin is making a statement confirming Starmer knew every detail of how much Mandeleson failed the Security Checks BUT chose to ignore them to give his best"friend" the job
even though you have provided zero evidence this seems legitApparently (allegedly) the guy Starmer sacked to save his own skin is making a statement confirming Starmer knew every detail of how much Mandeleson failed the Security Checks BUT chose to ignore them to give his best"friend" the job
Calm down Slurpy the (allegedly) covers all options and outcomeseven though you have provided zero evidence this seems legit
From what I gather the guy he sacked and his department are fuming, so expect lots of **** to hit the fan.even though you have provided zero evidence this seems legit