You must log in or register to see media
This is just a clearly incorrect statement.
US TV hosts rally around Jimmy Kimmel and call out Trump & Co for their 'free speech' hypocrisy...
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clyxjve3pe2o

I didn't know what it was Jimmy Kimmel was supposed to have said to get himself taken off air. So I went and googled it today, and found in a copy of The Guardian his words quoted - now I'm not into speaking ill of anyone dead and I certainly do not agree with engaging in tit for tat point scoring over it, but having read his comments I thought personally he hadn't said anything wrong.
He made a political statement about the Republicans, he never said anything detriment of Charlie Kirk or his family, so it's a lot noise over ****ing nothing.
I did hear in the newpaper reviews yesterday, that it was to do with ratings and he should have been taken off air a long time ago, and this is the trouble everyone wants to out do everyone else and it gets to the stage of where you don't know what to believe anymore, but my own personal assessment of that is it's a bit of a coincidence to be taken off air now, and if we are to engage in free speech it shouldn't have happened.
It's a worrying development. The Trump administration didn't like what Jimmy Kimmel said and they have now used the State apparatus to shut down free speech that they don't agree with. Trump appointed a bloke called Brendan Carr to the Federal communications commission, which is a bit like Ofcom here. He should be an independent and non partisan regulator for the media, but he basically told the broadcasters 'We can do this the easy way or the hard way' which translated as you either take down content we don't like or we'll shut you down.
And Trump is now threatening to take away the licences of broadcasters who he feels are negative towards him. It has all the hallmarks of a dictator basically having ultimate control over the messages that the public receive.
It’s hard to argue against govt overreach and more surveillance in our lives. I’m not sure we’ve seen a PM ever directly threaten to shut down the media for broadcasting negative opinions about them though.
But I agree with the overall sentiment that our lives are more and more controlled and surveilled by govt (or govt contracted agencies)
I also think the clamour over immigration. (Which I agree is an issue that needs managing) will usher in digital ID, as it will be used as leverage to say ‘we can’t have people here who we know nothing about’ so therefore everybody will require digital ID
Y'all be wanting to join me in my rock cave up on the moors eating berries and foraged moss, when Big brother is deciding whether you've earned enough social credits to be allowed to go to the supermarket![]()
It's happened here too on some level.Free speech as long as we don’t disagree with it![]()
So you understand the mass invasion of Europe with the middle easts pond scum is by design then.It’s hard to argue against govt overreach and more surveillance in our lives. I’m not sure we’ve seen a PM ever directly threaten to shut down the media for broadcasting negative opinions about them though.
But I agree with the overall sentiment that our lives are more and more controlled and surveilled by govt (or govt contracted agencies)
I also think the clamour over immigration. (Which I agree is an issue that needs managing) will usher in digital ID, as it will be used as leverage to say ‘we can’t have people here who we know nothing about’ so therefore everybody will require digital ID


He should really put a leadership challenge in, would walk it.Downing Street to announce the new Deputy Prime Minister
You must log in or register to see images
So you understand the mass invasion of Europe with the middle easts pond scum is by design then.
Nice to have you on board finally mate![]()
Mass invasion it ain't though bro and this is where you're being played.
The numbers of people in migrant hotels is 30k. Out of a population of 70m
That's about 0.4% of the population.
Even less of a percentage is the billionaires in the UK, but who have far more of an impact on your life that Ahmed from Syria. They also control the social media channels that are feeding you the hysteria about Ahmed, so that you look over there and not at what they are doing.