Ehab’s Message To The Fans: Protesting, Concessions and the Council

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Barchullona said:
So you won't accept any hereditary wealth, no matter how little, so you aren't a cancer in society.

None of your business is a silly remark. Unless you have a fall out with your parents or they cut you out of their will you will be involved of course you could give your share to any siblings, orifyou are only one give it all to charity,
Click to expand...

I think it would be a great idea to start thinking about assets going back into society after death. I hate the idea of underserving individuals benefitting for **** all. Perhaps it won’t be possible but I like the idea.

I don’t know my parents wealth/equity status. I ask for nothing and expect nothing. I budget for nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FILEYseadog
Chazz Rheinhold said:
There's wouldn't be any anyway, near the Queen?? GTF
The security for royal events is massive. And so it should be for Liz.
Click to expand...

****, I find myself agreeing with the soppy old **** for a second time tonight.

Any ****ing about around the Queen will be dealt with swiftly.

Which just goes to show what a squeamish little tit Ehab is. Having to put out a fawning 'please don't do anything, please'. Beware people who speak with forked tongue.
 
Kempton said:
Are you serious, or should I be whooshed? Ehab is clearly talking about the Premier league's minimum 10% concession. He's taking the piss.
Click to expand...

I wrote that before I had seen the proposed concession rates & foolishly took his written word at face value.

If there’s a chance offered to engage it should be accepted. If it’s the usual one way engagement then those representative of supporters should exit, together, in solidarity.

The Trust Chairman got it about right on Humberside earlier.
 
Sir Cheshire Ben said:
I wrote that before I had seen the proposed concession rates & foolishly took his written word at face value.

If there’s a chance offered to engage it should be accepted. If it’s the usual one way engagement then those representative of supporters should exit, together, in solidarity.

The Trust Chairman got it about right on Humberside earlier.
Click to expand...
Agreed.
It says proposal and if he is willing to sit down and listen to a counter proposal then great.
If not it will get worse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sir Cheshire Ben
PLT said:
He's just saying that they will be consulting isn't he?
Click to expand...
I was referring to this bit. Suggests he's been talking with somebody.

Concessions

Based on a positive recommendation from the aforementioned supporter consultation
 
Julian Edelman said:
1 Put the signs back up.
2 Put Hull City afc on the badge( don' care if its current badge as long as its on)
3 let people use indoor arena again
4 Get rid of gate.
5 Admit that name change was wrong and say sorry to fans.
6 Reduce the prices these aren't
cheap..
7 Pay out for players in January.
Then I will consider..
Click to expand...


Ha, ha. I bet he takes one look at your proud Three Hull Crowns and seethes and spits and doesn't even read your entirely reasonable suggestions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Edelman
Party Hull! said:
Not enough. In fact it’s barely anything.

Essential requirements thus -

The membership scheme should be scrapped and season tickets brought back with full concessions.

Hull City returned to ALL communications and a statement to confirm the Hull Tigers and Hull City Tigers experiments are ended.

The old badge restored.

Apology to evicted tenants of the Airco arena. ‘Tenants Rights’ are important again now it seems.

Apology to fans for falsely labelling them hooligans.

Removal of gate around stadium. We are a welcoming city, not a prison complex.

Restoration of Council signage.

That’ll do for me right now off the top of my head.

The Queen and her son dodge tax so deserve no reverence. Hereditary authority and hereditary wealth are two of societies great cancers. Do not be tempted to accept an empty offer and be pacified by such twats.

A looooooooooong way to go.

No deal!
Click to expand...

Spot on Party.
 
Fez said:
This is amusing and very well written. Probably the most cynical pisstake I've ever read.

It has nothing to do with the stress ball demo, he is simply using it as a method of deflection.

This is all about appeasing the nuisance that is football's regulators and a persistent MP. These are empty words, they goad those who oppose him.

There has not been any concession given, he's moved the goalposts in full sight and is having another good laugh at everyone.

He's making a cynical play for the moral high ground, don't be foolish and attend these meetings and play his well thought through game.
Click to expand...

Good post Fez , surprised that some people here have bought this
 
You must log in or register to see images



strange how you pay £1.5 million (thus avoiding c£750k in tax) out of a £4.1 million project and get your name all over the place, yet the rest of us paid £2.6 million, with no tax avoidance and our names are no-where to be seen
 
  • Like
Reactions: HHH, askewshair and Edelman
Barchullona said:
To be honest the prices aren't outrageous in comparison to a lot of other clubs except for the ickets for the very young.

Having the name on the badge isn't a big deal. We never had the club name on the badge until the late 1970s. When we did gave a badge up until then it was just a tiger's head. Except for one season before the war when we played in blue and had the 3 coronetson the shirt. If Harold .Needler had got his way in 1946 we wouldn't have been playing in black and Amber and would have had the three crowns as a badge. The first shirt with a tiger's head on was a couple if years after his failed attempt to change the club name and kit.
Not having the name on the badge doesn't matter. The first shirts with a badge only had a tiger's head on. What irritates me is that Allam put 1904 on there to try and justify his insistence we ave always been known as Hull City Tigers since our formation though we were .Hull City and the nickname didn't come about until a few seasons after our formation.
Click to expand...

That's the rub though hullona, historically right about the badge and the name thing, but it's the way it's been used by the twats in recent years. As a petty spiteful snub to anyone who has dared to slight them.

Another time I would have quite liked the modern 1904 badge. Hull City could have developed it's own 1904 clothing label, specific only to us in the same way we used to sing 01482. 01482 was only ever going to be ours, in support of the club. We didn't use it to piss anyone off.

ALLAMS OUT!!!
 
Last edited:
Arnold_Lane_HCFC said:
That's the rub though hullona, historically right about the badge and the name thing, but it's the way it's been used by the twats in recent years. As a petty spiteful snub to anyone who has dared to slight them.

Another time I would have quite liked the modern 1904 badge. Hull City could have developed it's own 1904 clothing label, specific only to us in the same way we used to sing 01482. 01482 was only ever going to be ours, in support of the club. We didn't use it to piss anyone off.

ALLAMS OUT!!!
Click to expand...

01482? " OHU2, that's the code for me...".
 
charon-the-ferryman said:
You must log in or register to see images



strange how you pay £1.5 million (thus avoiding c£750k in tax) out of a £4.1 million project and get your name all over the place, yet the rest of us paid £2.6 million, with no tax avoidance and our names are no-where to be seen
Click to expand...

You often speak sense. Not in that post though.
 
Barchullona said:
You often speak sense. Not in that post though.
Click to expand...

pay 100% you have every right to have your name on it - ie Ferens Art Gallery, land and building donated by Thomas Ferens - I don't get it when you donate something like 20%, no matter how generous the donation was
 
charon-the-ferryman said:
pay 100% you have every right to have your name on it - ie Ferens Art Gallery, land and building donated by Thomas Ferens - I don't get it when you donate something like 20%, no matter how generous the donation was
Click to expand...
Would it still have happened without his 1.6m?

Genuine question, I honestly don’t care whose names on the building, it’s what’s inside that matters to me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back