Exactly. Surely you could now spend some 40 million (24 for Bent and 16 for Henderson?) on players who will get you 20 goals a season.
well i was told the other day from a friend who works out at the club and i said this deal would include either ngog or kelly, granted kelly was long shot but was told it was going to be a loan and that henderson is def going. he also said bruce wouldnt get a penny of the bent to spend, at a niall quinn roadshow quinn did say that the money we wil get for bent wont reach 24 million & it is all in instalments
You have to laugh at some of our posters on here. I'm quite sure that some of them who are now saying we are crazy for doing this deal, are the same ones who were saying he is ****e and we should sell him when he went through a bad patch last season....
David N'gog Stat's for Liverpool (competetive games) Started 41 games = came off a total 418 minutes from these starts. Came on Sub 53 games = had 936 minutes as a sub Total Games 94 121 shots 50 on target 19 goals 1 assist Knowledge is the Bomb
Just to make myself clear on this subject I like Henderson , i think the fee was too good to turn down, dont think he is worth it. my argument is the signing of n'gog
He's been there three seasons and has 9 goals in 63 appearances. He did have Torres ahead of him most of that time. Having said that whenever I've seen him he was complete ****e.
why dont you just keep him then, if hes that good, we dont want to rip you off, IMO, he aint good enough
Not good enough, if Liverpool cant get enything out of him, how can Bruce the Tactition hope to to do better?
Okay. Let's say N'Gog isn't Bents replacement. Why the **** would he leave Liverpool to warm our bench, unless he knows hes a parcel of ****e and is happy to do so? The reason Liverpool havent played him and the reason he hasn't got many goals for his games is simple. He's no ****ing use. He may reach his potential going back to a European league more suited to him but he'll never make it in the EPL. I've watched him miss sitters and look totally anonymous and cant recall a game I saw him where I thought "hello, he'd be a canny signing". Not once and I watched all of Liverpool's European games. He is Anthony le Tallec all over again. Weak as piss and cant hit a barn door. Liverpool fans that have watched him for 3 years cant even make their mind up, so that tells me enough to say he will fail miserably at the SOL.
All players miss sitters. Tevez against us last season, Bent on Saturday to name but two. That doesn't make them bad players though. We haven't even signed the lad and you are slating him. He may not prove to be the answer to our prayers but, if we do sign him, you have to give him the chance to show what he can do. I mean we saw all these kind of comments when we brought Welbeck from Utd and he didn't turn out too bad did he.
If we were paying £7m or £8m for Welbeck I'd be relatively happy mate but £1 for N'Gog is 99p to much. The lad is shocking.
If you scroll down on his wikipedia game you get them stats so it seems you have aswell. And 19 out of 93 is just as terrible. The guys a impact player, when he starts a match he looks like a headless chicken. Bruce is off his rocker!
Some players just dont fit into certain teams, others cant get a run in the team, others just cant score for toffee at certain teams. just look at Forlan for Man U (63 and 10 goals for man U), couldnt score at all hardly, went to spain and was getting 25-30 every season, and the other end of the spectrum, Shevchenko, could not stop scoring in italy, came over here and struggled big time. yes N`Gogs record is pretty dire, and it may not improve any, but it might and we may be surprised at how well he does. I wont knock him until he has had a run of games under his belt.
Well we appreciate your opinion mate & indeed respect it. It just seems that most of us on here think he's a pile of **** like. Not like the Scousers to have a moan. Calm down, calm down.
