Crime - part deux.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should crime happen

  • Go on then why not.

  • Yes

  • Stfu sucky

  • Tobes and peej welch couple

  • Suck Roy's tits


Results are only viewable after voting.
There's also something called justice.

If you don't support locking people up because you think that's about revenge you need to go further and give your suggestions on how you deal with it because to me it looks like you don't support locking murderers, rapists, *****s or any other criminal up. What would you do with them when they commit their crimes?
Send them to jocklund, build a big **** off wall then nuke it
 
Our justice system is broken. Chucking a couple of years on a few sentences won't fix it.
It's been dismantled from the streets to the courts and it's only going to get worse.
 
Our justice system is broken. Chucking a couple of years on a few sentences won't fix it.
It's been dismantled from the streets to the courts and it's only going to get worse.

Makes for a good headline though which is the main thing. Tough on crime and all that. Pensioners feel re-assured skimming through their copy of The Express.
 
There's also something called justice.

If you don't support locking people up because you think that's about revenge you need to go further and give your suggestions on how you deal with it because to me it looks like you don't support locking murderers, rapists, *****s or any other criminal up. What would you do with them when they commit their crimes?

Of course I support locking people up if they commit crimes, I just don't support the push to make sentences ever longer as it doesn't work.

If 15 years isn't a deterrent for a crime then 30 years won't be either. The whole point of the justice system is lessen crime. The more money you spend on prisons keeping people locked up, the less money you have to spend on police officers to help keep crime down.

Not that I'm a fan of speed cameras... But when you see a speed camera, do you not slow down?

Its because you know you will be caught (the true deterrent). You're probably less likely to slow down if you see "road work, fines doubled" signs.

Human nature, it's not the severity of the punishment that deters us, it's the chance you can get away with the crime or not without being punished.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PleaseNotPoll
Hmmm making criminals fear they're more likely to get caught or longer prison sentences?

Just a thought but a novel idea might be to do both. We could try that.

But that would mean undoing a decade's worth of cuts to the police, community services, judiciary and legal court system, and prison services.

As a wise man once said, you can't get juice out of an orange you haven't got. I think it was Gandhi or Linekar. Just know it was someone who never got booked.
 
Of course I support locking people up if they commit crimes, I just don't support the push to make sentences ever longer as it doesn't work.

If 15 years isn't a deterrent for a crime then 30 years won't be either. The whole point of the justice system is lessen crime. The more money you spend on prisons keeping people locked up, the less money you have to spend on police officers to help keep crime down.

Not that I'm a fan of speed cameras... But when you see a speed camera, do you not slow down?

Its because you know you will be caught (the true deterrent). You're probably less likely to slow down if you see "road work, fines doubled" signs.

Human nature, it's not the severity of the punishment that deters us, it's the chance you can get away with the crime or not without being punished.

so you reckon you would keep speeding if they automatically disqualified you or if they pounded your car?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
so you reckon you would keep speeding if they automatically disqualified you or if they pounded your car?

I don’t think mechanophilia should be used as a deterrent mate

You must log in or register to see images
 
so you reckon you would keep speeding if they automatically disqualified you or if they pounded your car?
You know this happens to people and they still do it, right?
Watch any of those police reality shows and they get tons of them.
They just start buying really cheap cars and carry on as normal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Milk..
so you reckon you would keep speeding if they automatically disqualified you or if they pounded your car?

Yes. If I thought there was little chance of being caught.

In an extreme example: If there were only one parking attendant in Greater London, it wouldnt matter if a parking ticket was £20, £2000, or they took your car and crushed it (after giving it a good pounding and some bukake action)... People would park illegally because they would think they weren't going to get caught.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PleaseNotPoll
You know this happens to people and they still do it, right?
Watch any of those police reality shows and they get tons of them.
They just start buying really cheap cars and carry on as normal.

yup, but potato was talking about the normal person. Most people if the severity is big enough will stop with that as a deterrent.

If you knew they were going to up the punishment, would you carry on speeding because i know i wouldn't. That is the point really.

You're always going to get people who murder and gangs who carry knives. It's how to bring that number down as you will never get that to zero.

In any case the car speeding analogy was just a bad one imo as if people knew they would go to prison for speeding, 80% of the normal population would automatically not speed (on purpose anyway)
 
Yes. If I thought there was little chance of being caught.

In an extreme example: If there were only one parking attendant in Greater London, it wouldnt matter if a parking ticket was £20, £2000, or they took your car and crushed it (after giving it a good pounding and some bukake action)... People would park illegally because they would think they weren't going to get caught.

So in this example, it's because there is a lack of parking attendents (police in real life for knife crime).

Likewise, if i knew that the police were just going to ask me very nicely not to speed each time i sped, i don't think i'm going to stop speeding. It doesn't matter if theres a policeman on every corner, that won't stop myself speeding

Likewise, if a gangster is going to carry around a knife and start stabbing people, told to stop and given a suspended community sentence, i'm not sure he's going to stop.
 
Yes. If I thought there was little chance of being caught.

In an extreme example: If there were only one parking attendant in Greater London, it wouldnt matter if a parking ticket was £20, £2000, or they took your car and crushed it (after giving it a good pounding and some bukake action)... People would park illegally because they would think they weren't going to get caught.

So Harlesden, basically.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sucky
yup, but potato was talking about the normal person. Most people if the severity is big enough will stop with that as a deterrent.

If you knew they were going to up the punishment, would you carry on speeding because i know i wouldn't. That is the point really.

You're always going to get people who murder and gangs who carry knives. It's how to bring that number down as you will never get that to zero.

In any case the car speeding analogy was just a bad one imo as if people knew they would go to prison for speeding, 80% of the normal population would automatically not speed (on purpose anyway)
You bring it down by working out why it happens in the first place and addressing the cause.
Add proper policing, rehabilitation, a functional court system and you'd be getting somewhere.
You'll still have fruitcakes doing stupid ****, of course, as that's never going to change.
Not putting them in charge of the criminal justice system might help, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyD