Coronavirus

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Boris...


  • Total voters
    24
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah Duncan Smith was a tosser when he was in charge of benefits. Didn't he propose a massive cut to disability benefit and then resign over the same issue ? I can't remember how that played out.
He threatened to resign when Osborne cut the earnings taper of UC ( as the HoL had knocked back his cut to tax credits ) but didn't go thru with it .

PS the taper has recently been restored to the original .
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyD and brb
I agree but it wasn't the point I was trying to make. That is that I don't believe any current existing political party in the UK would increase UC by £20 a week. Hindsight is a wonderful thing, saying I'd rather money go in to this, rather than that, Captain hindsight does that all the time. I will await the next GE where it will be party policy if elected that they will go ahead with the £20 increase. It won't happen.

out of curiousty, how much does raising UC 20 quid a week cost the exchequer (i don't know myself). T&T is still ongoing right now.

I highly respected mate of mine he is definition of working class and is a lefty (raised in millwall, proper chav) and he doesn't like tories.

I haven't really thought of Starmer much but thought he gets a bad rep but my mate says he thinks starmer is charmless and bland and more importantly that labour don't stand for anything and have no policies themselves which was a bit of an eye opener.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
out of curiousty, how much does raising UC 20 quid a week cost the exchequer (i don't know myself). T&T is still ongoing right now.

I highly respected mate of mine he is definition of working class and is a lefty (raised in millwall, proper chav) and he doesn't like tories.

I haven't really thought of Starmer much but thought he gets a bad rep but my mate says he thinks starmer is charmless and bland and more importantly that labour don't stand for anything and have no policies themselves which was a bit of an eye opener.
well in oct 2021 there 5.8m UC claimants so £116-00mpw
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyD
out of curiousty, how much does raising UC 20 quid a week cost the exchequer (i don't know myself). T&T is still ongoing right now.

I highly respected mate of mine he is definition of working class and is a lefty (raised in millwall, proper chav) and he doesn't like tories.

I haven't really thought of Starmer much but thought he gets a bad rep but my mate says he thinks starmer is charmless and bland and more importantly that labour don't stand for anything and have no policies themselves which was a bit of an eye opener.

I don't know the figure Bobby, but I can see someone has replied since with a figure.

I did see a figure many many months back, but I just don't remember it, other than thinking to myself shhite, that's a lot of dough. I also accept the arguments that Tories have wasted that same amount of dough. However, merely as a policy for any party, do I see it as feasable uplift, no I don't, unless you can take the working element out, by forcing employers to pay decent wages, but even then, some workers would still need to rely on UC (an assumption).

I get very annoyed with Boris when he talks about UC from only a worker perspective, it's clear discrimination on his part, and worse still, he knows what he's doing, it's an old tactic employers use to use to avoid industrial action during company mergers, you uplift a certain segment of your workforce, to force a confidence vote through, oldest trick in the book.

If anyone has been following this convo, this is the part that I said went to the High Court, I've not heard any outcome of this yet, it seems to have dropped right out of the news... https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/lifestyle/money/dwp-legal-case-over-20-25042566

In regards to the bit about Starmer, I prefer to sit on the fence with him for now, rather than giving the odd banter that he's shhite from time to time. I need more time to assess the guy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyD
well in oct 2021 there 5.8m UC claimants so £116-00mpw

so around 42 billion pounds.

that's a pretty large amount of UC payments, thats like a tenth of the population (inc kids). I'm guessing not everyone would get the 20 quid and is that also because of furlough recently or just that there are that many people underpaid?
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
so around 42 billion pounds.

that's a pretty large amount of UC payments, thats like a tenth of the population (inc kids). I'm guessing not everyone would get the 20 quid and is that also because of furlough recently or just that there are that many people underpaid?
i make it just over £6 bn per annum . Everyone would get the £20 . The benefit system has for decades helped people in low wage jobs under variously named schemes e.g Family Income Supplement (FIS) however in the last 20 years the number has ballooned and that is why i have a certain cynicism about claims of high employment as in lots of cases far more is being paid by the state to the wage earner than the state receive back in direct taxation inc NI .
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyD and brb
I can see the argument that breaking the law for 10 minutes is perfectly reasonable.

During the lockdown I went to a rave... only for 10 mins.

Then I went to a lock in, at a pub which was supposed to be closed. That was also for 10 mins.

I also attended a mass orgy at a brothel in Withington. But that was only 5 mins... I wasn't going to do it twice <whistle>

Anyone for cake?
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE and Tobes
i make it just over £6 bn per annum . Everyone would get the £20 . The benefit system has for decades helped people in low wage jobs under variously named schemes e.g Family Income Supplement (FIS) however in the last 20 years the number has ballooned and that is why i have a certain cynicism about claims of high employment as in lots of cases far more is being paid by the state to the wage earner than the state receive back in direct taxation inc NI .

Whoops i was being dumb, i multipled number of days rather than weeks. Why you are the brains and i'm Bobis Johnson
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tobes and brb
I can't remember now tbph, but something we agree on is he is a grade A shhite of the highest order. I think I heard some later excuses he was forced to make certain changes, bullshite, you should have resigned, he might of done as you say, but not sure if it was due to his morals or some other reason linked to it. But to then call for the £20pw to remain, which is the right thing to do, was a bit rich coming from him.
I remember the video of that twat literally cheering and laughing in the House, when the Tory / Lib Dem Govt introduced the raft of benefit cuts that came with their ‘austerity’ measures. He’s a truly rancid bloke, who seems to call literally everything wrong. His consistency is incredible.
 
i make it just over £6 bn per annum . Everyone would get the £20 . The benefit system has for decades helped people in low wage jobs under variously named schemes e.g Family Income Supplement (FIS) however in the last 20 years the number has ballooned and that is why i have a certain cynicism about claims of high employment as in lots of cases far more is being paid by the state to the wage earner than the state receive back in direct taxation inc NI .

to be honest i would sooner rather we up the UC by 20 quid than the tens of billions we fork out on social care for those who own homes/trust funds :P
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
i make it just over £6 bn per annum . Everyone would get the £20 . The benefit system has for decades helped people in low wage jobs under variously named schemes e.g Family Income Supplement (FIS) however in the last 20 years the number has ballooned and that is why i have a certain cynicism about claims of high employment as in lots of cases far more is being paid by the state to the wage earner than the state receive back in direct taxation inc NI .
We could have used that £4.3BN he’s just written off, as he’s too embarrassed to have the true details of the huge criminal frauds that went off with the COVID loans exposed, as they’ll highlight gross incompetence.

But if you or I owe the revenue even just a couple of quid, they’ll chase us to the ends of the earth for it. Go for a **** and miss your UC credit call, here have a sanction and go hungry.
 
We could have used that £4.3BN he’s just written off, as he’s too embarrassed to have the true details of the huge criminal frauds that went off with the COVID loans exposed, as they’ll highlight gross incompetence.

But if you or I owe the revenue even just a couple of quid, they’ll chase us to the ends of the earth for it. Go for a **** and miss your UC credit call, here have a sanction and go hungry.

Absolutely this. The one thing i would say is that in terms of covid loans scandal, this will be a one off as i don't foresee another lockdown and money being doled out (i'm sure they will find other ways) which is why i say social care as that will be ongoing money going on forever likewise with UC
 
We could have used that £4.3BN he’s just written off, as he’s too embarrassed to have the true details of the huge criminal frauds that went off with the COVID loans exposed, as they’ll highlight gross incompetence.

But if you or I owe the revenue even just a couple of quid, they’ll chase us to the ends of the earth for it. Go for a **** and miss your UC credit call, here have a sanction and go hungry.
Not sure what that has to do with my reply to President Bobby .
 
The real debate? What, you making your Mystic Meg predictions about Labour in the future.

You got fck all to justify being duped by the charlatans you voted for, so you do your "look over there" routine.

What are you going to do next, bend spoons with the power of your mind?

The real debate is what I want it to be sunshine. £20 a week is fck all compared to the tens of billions lost in legal loopholes that benefit the rich and wealthy.

And before you go making your Mystic Meg predictions, here's a thought, consider what Labour actually proposed in the last GE. Including the 4 day week which the right wing media and your Tory baffoons ridiculed. Guess what more than 30 companies in Britain are trialing now?

Now fck off, there's a good lad <ok>

I tell you what, we had a decent debate on here this afternoon until you rocked up, the guy, YOU that posted on the forum about the stanley knife slitting wrists, that I took offence too. Ever since then you want to see if you can provoke me, so I'm going to bounce you off, so we don't have to do this anymore.
 
We could have used that £4.3BN he’s just written off, as he’s too embarrassed to have the true details of the huge criminal frauds that went off with the COVID loans exposed, as they’ll highlight gross incompetence.

But if you or I owe the revenue even just a couple of quid, they’ll chase us to the ends of the earth for it. Go for a **** and miss your UC credit call, here have a sanction and go hungry.

When I started work many decades ago I was advised by one of my older colleagues that I should marry a rich but ugly girl rather than a pretty but poor one I ignored that, the other advice was never to owe the bank a pound because they would hound you to death, but if you owed the bank a million pounds you would be the bank managers best friend

Both pieces of advise still appear to be sound all these years later
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyD
Bobby had worked out from my original £116 mpw that is was £42 bn and i was just giving my calculations and made no comment on whether it can be afforded or not - though if asked i assume no party will go into the next election promising a £20 pw uplift to UC .
I didn’t say you did.
 
Brilliant interview with Rory Stewart that I saw this afternoon, well I thought it was, and I agree with what he says.

For those interested and prepared to listen to all of it, I also agreed with his views on Biden and especially Putin, where he says it's a waste of time having discussions with him.

For me Rory summed it up early in the interview, when he said something like, politics has become about winning and loyalty, rather than the best people for the job, and people that actually know the job.

He smashes our democratic system to bits. Not just the Tories but Labour as well.

As he says, Elective Dictatorship...

https://news.sky.com/video/stewart-uk-is-an-elective-dictatorship-12521202
Nice of Rory to catch up with me on This. :emoticon-0148-yes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock and brb
Status
Not open for further replies.