Off Topic Coronavirus

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
You have a short memory Bob. when you posted that you were leaving this board a while back who was it that sent you a personal message telling you to stay? I also posted to Wills to tell him that I would never report on him or any other poster. You know who the mods are... ask them? They will tell you that I have never sent any messages reporting or complaining about other posters. That's not me. If someone irritates me I put them on 'ignore' for a month then move on. Yet it's sad that you believe an imbecile who is saying that I would 'grass up' another poster? Don't embarrass yourself by being the only one 'liking' his rubbish. If it's true then he can present the post for all to see? I don't mind I have nothing to hide. I said before I really enjoy your football stuff, don't be someone's lackey.:emoticon-0148-yes:

Grass
 
Okay show every the post because according to you you have seen this or been told by others.
Come on Mr Always Right. I am calling you out... show the board the post and let them make up their minds?
We await this information?
 
People have to believe that the rules they are being asked to follow are proportionate and effective. Remember the first lock-down, when we were told that we were only allowed to leave the house for exercise once a day and for an hour maximum? Daft. Remember the woman that was arrested for sitting on her own on a park bench for too long? There are six people in my household, including two young children, so if my second daughter comes to visit, bringing my other grandchild, we're breaking the law. Am I going to tell her not to come? Of course I'm not, but my neighbours are being encouraged to report me to the police. Ridiculous.
I’m coming round to the view that the government has lost the plot entirely, they’ve given up on trying to explain, persuade and convince the population to protect themselves and each other, and are focussing on threatening with fines and policing of incoherent regulations instead. It won’t work, treat people like children and they behave like children. Plus, as the police themselves are saying, they don’t have the capacity to cajole people into following distancing rules.

If the increasingly insane rules which now apply in Newcastle are rolled out here, I won’t be allowed to visit my 81 year old mother who lives alone. Really? The thing which we have been promised - quick and easy regular testing/antibody testing (I’ve seen these in play and they take ten minutes and are self administered. Why hasn’t everybody had one?) where people get some shareable verifiable document/e-document to show they are clear is the only way forward to allow commerce to function until a vaccine is available. It doesn’t even matter if the tests aren’t that accurate, it’s a psychological thing. If they are good enough to be used as a basis for restrictive rules they should also be good enough to permit free movement.

But this isn’t about the virus. It’s about the NHS.
 
I’m coming round to the view that the government has lost the plot entirely, they’ve given up on trying to explain, persuade and convince the population to protect themselves and each other, and are focussing on threatening with fines and policing of incoherent regulations instead. It won’t work, treat people like children and they behave like children. Plus, as the police themselves are saying, they don’t have the capacity to cajole people into following distancing rules.

If the increasingly insane rules which now apply in Newcastle are rolled out here, I won’t be allowed to visit my 81 year old mother who lives alone. Really? The thing which we have been promised - quick and easy regular testing/antibody testing (I’ve seen these in play and they take ten minutes and are self administered. Why hasn’t everybody had one?) where people get some shareable verifiable document/e-document to show they are clear is the only way forward to allow commerce to function until a vaccine is available. It doesn’t even matter if the tests aren’t that accurate, it’s a psychological thing. If they are good enough to be used as a basis for restrictive rules they should also be good enough to permit free movement.

But this isn’t about the virus. It’s about the NHS.
I heard something about T cell immunity yesterday. Something similar to antibody immunity. Do you know about this?
 
Okay show every the post because according to you you have seen this or been told by others.
Come on Mr Always Right. I am calling you out... show the board the post and let them make up their minds?
We await this information?

Show me the post where I’ve ‘seen this’.....

I BELIEVE you are a stinking grass.....the lowest of the low.....it’s my BELIEF you snitch on other posters.

Cant change the way I feel, princess. You’ll always be a grass in my eyes
 
I’m coming round to the view that the government has lost the plot entirely, they’ve given up on trying to explain, persuade and convince the population to protect themselves and each other, and are focussing on threatening with fines and policing of incoherent regulations instead. It won’t work, treat people like children and they behave like children. Plus, as the police themselves are saying, they don’t have the capacity to cajole people into following distancing rules.

If the increasingly insane rules which now apply in Newcastle are rolled out here, I won’t be allowed to visit my 81 year old mother who lives alone. Really? The thing which we have been promised - quick and easy regular testing/antibody testing (I’ve seen these in play and they take ten minutes and are self administered. Why hasn’t everybody had one?) where people get some shareable verifiable document/e-document to show they are clear is the only way forward to allow commerce to function until a vaccine is available. It doesn’t even matter if the tests aren’t that accurate, it’s a psychological thing. If they are good enough to be used as a basis for restrictive rules they should also be good enough to permit free movement.

But this isn’t about the virus. It’s about the NHS.
Blimey ... you are really on a roll Sb. Another completely sensible post.
It was said a long time ago, a decent App that can prove your likely ‘clean’ from virus should allow you access - just as Staines has to when he visits his gym - and even he isn’t complaining (much :emoticon-0100-smile) about it. And it’s up to the App user to be responsible :) for what they input into their App. Is it 100%. No. But neither is driving down the same road every day to work in a metal box that moves at high speed.
 
Blimey ... you are really on a roll Sb. Another completely sensible post.
It was said a long time ago, a decent App that can prove your likely ‘clean’ from virus should allow you access - just as Staines has to when he visits his gym - and even he isn’t complaining (much :emoticon-0100-smile) about it. And it’s up to the App user to be responsible :) for what they input into their App. Is it 100%. No. But neither is driving down the same road every day to work in a metal box that moves at high speed.
Relative risk assessment seems to be a discipline that is not felt to be required in this situation.

Although I can understand that it is of little solace to those who have suffered, in any way, from the virus, to be told that they were just statistically unlucky.
 
Show me the post where I’ve ‘seen this’.....

I BELIEVE you are a stinking grass.....the lowest of the low.....it’s my BELIEF you snitch on other posters.

Cant change the way I feel, princess. You’ll always be a grass in my eyes
I actually said: "according to you you have seen this or been told by others."
I just think you’re a grass. It was pointed out to me that some on here won’t debate with you (impossible anyway as you just mock, avoid answering questions and put up stupid ****ing emojis) because they feel they would be banned. At the time I didn’t believe it....but then a few names were mentioned in private and I’ve realised it’s all true.....sad and somewhat shocking really.
The problem is you don't think, you just say. Now you are claiming it's 'snitching on Posters'? More than one? Crap the board better watch out!
What's more troubling is that you are showing no respect to the Mods because they must all be in on this conspiracy as well?
The problem is Staines there was never a complaint from me. it's all in your head.
So I guess the answer to all this is that you have no proof (yet you claim you do in private?) mmm That really does speak volumes. You are always willing to call me a WUM yet really you are worse than me because you not only get personal but act like an imbecile...
Anyway, I will continue with the debate and you can think what you want.
 
Last edited:
I actually said: "according to you you have seen this or been told by others."

The problem is you don't think, you just say. Now you are claiming it's 'snitching on Posters'? More than one? Crap the board better watch out!
What's more troubling is that you are showing no respect to the Mods because they must all be in on this conspiracy as well?
The problem is Staines there was never a complaint from me. it's all in your head.
So I guess the answer to all this is that you have no proof (yet you claim you do in private?) mmm That really does speak volumes. You are always willing to call me a WUM yet really you are worse than me because you not only get personal but act like an imbecile...
Anyway, I will continue with the debate and you can think what you want.

What you talking about you ****ing idiot......any imbecile (even you) can see it’s two different things.


I stand by the fact I have been given at least one name of someone who will not debate with you because they fear they will be banned.....I didn’t believe it at the time but a name was given to me by Will (No secret there). Out of respect to Will and the other poster I will not mention names, even in private.

Never said I had proof you were a grass......just it all adds up that you are. I always don’t have any proof that god doesn’t exist.....but I believe he doesn’t.

Any way, you’re a grass/snitch.....end of conversation.
 
What you talking about you ****ing idiot......any imbecile (even you) can see it’s two different things.


I stand by the fact I have been given at least one name of someone who will not debate with you because they fear they will be banned.....I didn’t believe it at the time but a name was given to me by Will (No secret there). Out of respect to Will and the other poster I will not mention names, even in private.

Never said I had proof you were a grass......just it all adds up that you are. I always don’t have any proof that god doesn’t exist.....but I believe he doesn’t.

Any way, you’re a grass/snitch.....end of conversation.

So you have no proof. just hearsay. As I have said all along you are talking rubbish.
it's best if I put you to rest while you grow up. TBH you add nothing when debating with me, you just insult and come across as an arrogant know F all.
I think its best if we stop ruining the thread for the others. I will put you on ignore and hopefully, you will do the same and we won't need to argue.
 
What you talking about you ****ing idiot......any imbecile (even you) can see it’s two different things.


I stand by the fact I have been given at least one name of someone who will not debate with you because they fear they will be banned.....I didn’t believe it at the time but a name was given to me by Will (No secret there). Out of respect to Will and the other poster I will not mention names, even in private.

Never said I had proof you were a grass......just it all adds up that you are. I always don’t have any proof that god doesn’t exist.....but I believe he doesn’t.

Any way, you’re a grass/snitch.....end of conversation.

It's not a good position to be in to accuse some of being a grass, Stainsey and then provide no evidence and admit you haven't got any. If you don't like Ellers's views or approach, fine, but you need evidence before accusing someone of being a snitch. Just good old British fair play, isn't it?
 
For feck sake lads it's like the playground on here at times.....it'll be "my dad's bigger than your dad" next.....

This can be an interesting and informative thread about something that we've all got to live with for the foreseeable future....let's keep some perspective....
 
You have a short memory Bob. when you posted that you were leaving this board a while back who was it that sent you a personal message telling you to stay? I also posted to Wills to tell him that I would never report on him or any other poster. You know who the mods are... ask them? They will tell you that I have never sent any messages reporting or complaining about other posters. That's not me. If someone irritates me I put them on 'ignore' for a month then move on. Yet it's sad that you believe an imbecile who is saying that I would 'grass up' another poster? Don't embarrass yourself by being the only one 'liking' his rubbish. If it's true then he can present the post for all to see? I don't mind I have nothing to hide. I said before I really enjoy your football stuff, don't be someone's lackey.:emoticon-0148-yes:
I make up my own mind my friend. If you feel free to call people imbeciles and use your usual insulting post in reply, then people are free to call you slippery, grass, Ellersov or whatever. As for a short memory........what was I saying.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Staines R's