What’s a conspiracy theory website? An example of one? I don’t know any.
I can only form my opinions of world events based on information received. Same for most people on most things. Links and attachments are useful, people often ask for a source when none is provided. But I’ll attempt to answer.
I think this virus is real, I think it’s equivalent to a nasty seasonal flu. I think the media were all over it and relentless from early in the year. I think mainstream media play a huge part of the theatre production. I was baffled from day one that the global economy should be allowed to rot based on the modelling of an individual who had got it so vastly wrong many times. I was confused that the healthy should be quarantined. I was and still am confused why the legislation stated that regardless of other illnesses or diseases, if there is the mere suspicion of symptoms, covid should be recorded on the death certificate, no autopsy, no second opinion. I think this virus was used as an opportunity to roll out all sorts of new control measures, the new notion of “lockdown”, tracking and tracing, massive tax raises to come, global vaccination. I think the looms of legislation were probably sitting in a drawer, waiting for any chance to be implemented. This was all largely based on instinct.
Subsequently voices started emerging, challenging the official narrative. Of course, these are not people who were on my radar before, but many seem wholly credible and highly qualified. When such voices exist but are given no airtime on the bbc or any of the main propaganda agencies, further suspicion is triggered.
Same with 9/11, thousands of professionals, never given a voice on MSM.
Same with the climate emergency, a huge meteorological, climatological, other scientific voice, never given a voice, in fact I believe a bbc directive from months ago stated that there should no longer be any balance on the topic.
I would link a 3 minute video summarising the position of the 160 German scientists who are gathering to question the official position, but it’s been taken down by YouTube, just like so many other challenging voices lately.
Has the mainstream media earned the right to be trusted over the years?
Have successive governments proven that their primary concerns are for the health and safety of the population and for the growing prosperity of the country they represent?
You said recently that you’re not prepared to listen to Cahill because of other, non scientific, info you know or believe about her, Mikowits because of her legal battle, and you don’t want to listen to Sumption because you don’t like him, can’t remember your feelings about Hitchins. What about John Ioannides, Sucharit Bhakdi, Knut Wittkowski or any of the other seeming big hitters with opposing opinions?[/QUOTE
Linking me and anything I post to the conspiracy thread is a cop out.
I post the things I post in the hope that people may believe that there is another side to the argument, that you’d not know about if you get your world view from the bbc.
Thank you for responding comprehensively. My original post was out of order.
Stay safe
