Partly true. It's up to an individual to decide where they draw the line based on their moral values. But I think there is also an objective test. What would the man on the Clapham omnibus (to use a past legal test of the "average, reasonable man") think. Nowadays, that test would find that jokes about the Holocaust and slavery for example, were not acceptable. And I suspect, disabled children would be included too.
Are we all bored with the plague ravaging the nation already?I disagree......personally I think anything goes myself (my original comment was more a snipe at Boyle who seems to me anyway to be an arrogant **** who can’t take stick when thrown at him).
I’d really be interested as to where you draw the line Goldie.....probably not for this thread. It’s always been a subject that interests me.
I better not put up my top 3 of offensive jokes I feel.......think a ban would be incoming.
I disagree......personally I think anything goes myself (my original comment was more a snipe at Boyle who seems to me anyway to be an arrogant **** who can’t take stick when thrown at him).
I’d really be interested as to where you draw the line Goldie.....probably not for this thread. It’s always been a subject that interests me.
I better not put up my top 3 of offensive jokes I feel.......think a ban would be incoming.
Well yes, not being able to visit a second home is hardly a hardship when many don't even have a garden, but I think his point is more about the arbitrariness of the rules. If someone is fortunate enough to have a second home, why shouldn't they be able to get in their car and drive to it? More importantly, why should those without a garden not be allowed to sunbathe in the park?
There is a difference though between a joke which seems to incite violence but is in fact a joke and actually inciting violence. And any **** who doesn’t understand that should have his head kicked in.I'm not in favour of over-censorship, so I agree with you that far. And so does the law to an extent. I'm not in favour of someone being prosecuted for making any joke although there are things you can't joke about legally - something that might incite violence for example. I think it's more that if a joke or a comedian offends public sensibilities to a great degree, that comedian should lose access to the public through the media. And certainly public funded media like the BBC. That happened to Bernard Manning and his racist jokes. He was pretty much confined to Northern Men's clubs. I do the same to Boyle, whom I cannot stand.
There is a difference though between a joke which seems to incite violence but is in fact a joke and actually inciting violence. And any **** who doesn’t understand that should have his head kicked in.
Quite unbelievable.Well, thank you for that view from the 1970's terraces, Stan. But that is not the law. The fact is that if someone tells a joke that is hostile to a person or group that is protected (race, religion, ethnic origin, sexual orientation, disability, gender) they could find themselves in trouble re hate speech.
If you don't like it, start petitioning your MP now.
Do itI disagree......personally I think anything goes myself (my original comment was more a snipe at Boyle who seems to me anyway to be an arrogant **** who can’t take stick when thrown at him).
I’d really be interested as to where you draw the line Goldie.....probably not for this thread. It’s always been a subject that interests me.
I better not put up my top 3 of offensive jokes I feel.......think a ban would be incoming.
Well, thank you for that view from the 1970's terraces, Stan. But that is not the law. The fact is that if someone tells a joke that is hostile to a person or group that is protected (race, religion, ethnic origin, sexual orientation, disability, gender) they could find themselves in trouble re hate speech.
If you don't like it, start petitioning your MP now.
Do it
Most of us are adults
Put them on the joke thread though as most of the so called grown ups don't frequent there
It’s politics mate, like everything else, stick it on that thread. Are you on your week off or on nights?This could have a thread of its own.......
It’s politics mate, like everything else, stick it on that thread. Are you on your week off or on nights?
Lenin is only a minor improvement on Mao by the way. And before you go there I’m not a fan of Trotsky, Stalin or Ho Chi Minh either.
Try this bloke.
You must log in or register to see images
Look closely at his cap badge.
It’s politics mate, like everything else, stick it on that thread. Are you on your week off or on nights?
Lenin is only a minor improvement on Mao by the way. And before you go there I’m not a fan of Trotsky, Stalin or Ho Chi Minh either.
Try this bloke.
You must log in or register to see images
Look closely at his cap badge.
Look after yourself.Last day off today then back to weekend day shifts.....only 3 days this week then off for r. To be honest, work will be a more restful experience than being at home...trying to home school the kids really isn’t good for my blood pressure
Starting my healthy eating/ upping the training from Monday.....been going for a few 11km runs which have been good as I’ve found a nice field nearby that gets me away from pavement and traffic, but to counter that I’ve been eating crap like chocolate raisins and tortilla chips that have got me putting on a stone since the gym visits have stopped.
I’ve tried but can’t make out the cap badge...Who is it ? I feel I should know.
Maybe the Rev Jim Jones should return....would that be more suitable ?![]()