Concept Kit

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
SydneyTiger14 said:
What are you on about? It's not an official group, I'm just saying there's a subsection of the City fan base that refuse to buy anything until we return to the old badge. Your post reminded me about that obsession so I commented on it. No mountains here.
Click to expand...
You said there were a 'group' of people that's what I'm 'on about'.I'm not part of any group, I'm an individual stating as fact that I don't like the ****ing badge,never have since it's inception and my mind isn't going to be swayed by some over opinionated,argument minded marsupial....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cambstiger, rovertiger and TwoWrights
Ric Glasgow said:
You said there were a 'group' of people that's what I'm 'on about'.I'm not part of any group, I'm an individual stating as fact that I don't like the ****ing badge,never have since it's inception and my mind isn't going to be swayed by some over opinionated,argument minded marsupial....
Click to expand...

I think you're conflating an official group with the more common use of the term referring to a number of people holding the same opinion Ric. I'm not asking you to tear up a membership card! <laugh>

Keep up the cheap shots though pal, you'll get it one day.
 
highpeak tiger said:
Not when it was designed by the Allams and imposed without consultation. I prefer the old one but will put up with the new, some will not, but hardly foolish.
Click to expand...

Our current badge was not imposed without consultation, it was very deliberately designed WITH fan input. It's also not the '190 4' one someone cited above so not sure if people missed the update a few seasons ago.

I'm not suggesting it's foolish to dislike the new one, I'm suggesting it's foolish to insist on a return to a decade old badge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tigerboy98, TinpotTiger and highpeak tiger
SydneyTiger14 said:
What are you on about? It's not an official group, I'm just saying there's a subsection of the City fan base that refuse to buy anything until we return to the old badge. Your post reminded me about that obsession so I commented on it. No mountains here.
Click to expand...
I knew what you meant Syd.

Interesting the badge should bring up such strong emotions though. I don’t buy much, if any, merch anyway, but thought the first 1 904 badge was appalling as it was another example of them deliberately removing the words Hull City.
I don’t mind the current one, and of course we’ve moved on from the ‘shorten the name’ nonsense.

However if there really are people who won’t buy merch because of the badge you’d have thought the club might consider a new one in a year or two (I can’t see them going backward, but a change might not be a bad thing)

Guess it depends how big that sub section is?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jim the Tiger and SydneyTiger14
dennisboothstash said:
I knew what you meant Syd.

Interesting the badge should bring up such strong emotions though. I don’t buy much, if any, merch anyway, but thought the first 1 904 badge was appalling as it was another example of them deliberately removing the words Hull City.
I don’t mind the current one, and of course we’ve moved on from the ‘shorten the name’ nonsense.

However if there really are people who won’t buy merch because of the badge you’d have thought the club might consider a new one in a year or two (I can’t see them going backward, but a change might not be a bad thing)

Guess it depends how big that sub section is?
Click to expand...

I think a new badge definitely makes sense all round but I wonder if some would still refuse. I've definitely seen a lot mention wanting the old badge back (the entire reason I brought it up) so curious if they'd accept a new badge.
 
SydneyTiger14 said:
It's also not the '190 4' one someone cited above so not sure if people missed the update a few seasons ago.
Click to expand...
I stand corrected, I now vaguely remember being asked to pick one of 3 (or 4) can't remember.
It reminds me of the Allam effort because of the 1904, which we could do to lose. But it could be worse (remember the Sheffield mafia's effort)
 
  • Like
Reactions: SydneyTiger14 and TwoWrights
SydneyTiger14 said:
I don't understand this obsession with the old badge?

Are there people who say they won't go back to the MKM unless they rename it the KC?
Click to expand...
If you don't understand it best to heed the words of Mr Zimmerman. :emoticon-0125-mmm:


The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine. By by by
 
TwoWrights said:
If you don't understand it best to heed the words of Mr Zimmerman. :emoticon-0125-mmm:


The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine. By by by
Click to expand...
Not "Balad of a thin man" based on some of the 'chubby' comments on here surely ...

You must log in or register to see media

More like...
You must log in or register to see media
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwoWrights
highpeak tiger said:
I stand corrected, I now vaguely remember being asked to pick one of 3 (or 4) can't remember.
It reminds me of the Allam effort because of the 1904, which we could do to lose. But it could be worse (remember the Sheffield mafia's effort)
Click to expand...

Was that like a referendum? Someone on here thinks people in Hull are too thick to vote in them and shouldn’t be allowed to leave the house.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Howdentiger2 and TwoWrights
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back