You **** off, you are too dumb to discuss any topic of science. For you, being an illiterate ****** is a medal of honour.
I didn't tag your ******ed ass
Off Topic Climate Change
- Thread starter Looney Leftie
- Start date
- Status
I didn't tag your ******ed ass
I will, guaranteed, as soon as those who disagree can post their "evidence". 29 pages and not one post with evidence
like I dont have you on ignoreWillful arseholes are a bore
the old ignore ploy.
They import sand after storms like Irma as it gets washed out to sea, also its a straight coastline, very susceptible to erosion
Nothing do with with sea level rise. The beach is not rising into the air, which is what would need to happen if sand was brought in to combat rising sea level.
Poor looney thought you were on to something, because he's thick
@Diego Lets settle this once and for all.
@Looney Leftie @Tobes @DerekTheMole
Lots of abstract talk of "objectivity" and "science"
Post your best most important piece of evidence for AGW controlling temperature and climate.
I've argued this to death in your past life as Sisu and it's impossible to discuss anything with you without you flying off the handle. Nowadays I like posts. Partially because I agree with them but mostly because it riles you right up. Same effect but less effort.
Edit. I should add that it's hilarious that you bring @Diego into this. His inability to research things for himself is legendary.
This,
Apparently liking a post makes you thick. Who knew?
So you post two pictures of the same beach to prove what exactly. Surely this is irrelevant to any climate change argument you're trying to have?
Even using LL table of sea rises, how would the pictures prove anything. The beach looks about 50 metres deep, so losing 150mm from the waters edge to the beach front, would be negligible to the human eye. That's without the beach effectively being reconstructed annually.
You claim to be open to discussion, but get very defensive when questioned on the relevance of some of your posts. Continually insulting LL doesn't demonstrate superior knowledge, it only shows arrogance.
Genuine question, do you struggle with your studies. When I was at university, having an open mind was a necessity to the whole learning experience.
Don't believe everything your favourite news source tells you, it makes it too easy for them
What favourite news source? I haven’t got one,
You’ve been conned by a goon again.
It wouldn’t matter what I posted, you’d decry it without even properly reading it. Your mind is set, you’ve fallen for the lure of the conspiracy, same as you always did. The laughable thing about your stance is that you’re claiming your view is that of ‘proper science’ whilst having a completely closed mind to anything that doesn’t fit your preconceived narrative that flies in the face of all of the current scientific consensus.@Diego Lets settle this once and for all.
@Looney Leftie @Tobes @DerekTheMole
Lots of abstract talk of "objectivity" and "science"
Post your best most important piece of evidence for AGW controlling temperature and climate.
You’re a ****ing clown, you’ve always been a clown, and you no doubt always will be. Seek help.
Last edited:
OK so first cop out.
That's one that cant provide evidence. Of course, its Tobes, and he doesn't understand the first thing about the topic but his insecurity and fragile ego has him talking in the abstract, skirting around the actual topic, and again about me (almost everything you've posted on this thread has been about me personally) That's how much I'm inside your head, and I dont even want to be there
Your life is a mess Tobes, you'll die alone in your grease filled chip van. You uneducated lonely pathetic ****
[HASHTAG]#objectivity[/HASHTAG]
[HASHTAG]#science[/HASHTAG]
Science
You must log in or register to see media
Ah yes, tweets in lieu of evidence. How quaint. Facebook warriors unite
Tobes, do you even know anything about anything re AGW or anything related? Its a fact, you dont. So you post tweets and talk about me
Me: post evidence for AGW
Tobes: I dont even know what evidence is, but if I post it you wont accept it
me: Post evidence for AGW
Looney: no
You morons have no idea do you, none of you will post evidence because it doesn't exist
Models = not evidence (not obs)
Correlation = not causation
Predictions all wrong, failed over and over
Show me the evidence. Even just 1 piece of solid evidence.. well you can't because it doesn't exist
Enter tweets and sewing circle jerks between the same 3 or 4 people
OK so first cop out.
That's one that cant provide evidence. Of course, its Tobes, and he doesn't understand the first thing about the topic but his insecurity and fragile ego has him talking in the abstract, skirting around the actual topic, and again about me (almost everything you've posted on this thread has been about me personally) That's how much I'm inside your head, and I dont even want to be there
Your life is a mess Tobes, you'll die alone in your grease filled chip van. You uneducated lonely pathetic ****
[HASHTAG]#objectivity[/HASHTAG]
[HASHTAG]#science[/HASHTAG]
Nope.
I could post reems of evidence, but you’d dismiss it as ‘false science’ as you’re a ****ing crank.
My life is far from a mess btw, I don’t have a chip van, and I’m not at all lonely. You emasculated freak
Nope.
I could post reems of evidence, but you’d dismiss it as ‘false science’ as you’re a ****ing crank.
My life is far from a mess btw, I don’t have a chip van, and I’m not at all lonely. You emasculated freak
I bet you cant post 1 bit of evidence
married with kids and professional career = emasculated
Sure
You fat talentless grease peddling loser
Didn’t read ^Ah yes, tweets in lieu of evidence. How quaint. Facebook warriors unite
Tobes, do you even know anything about anything re AGW or anything related? Its a fact, you dont. So you post tweets and talk about me
Me: post evidence for AGW
Tobes: I dont even know what evidence is, but if I post it you wont accept it
me: Post evidence for AGW
Looney: no
You morons have no idea do you, none of you will post evidence because it doesn't exist
Models = not evidence (not obs)
Correlation = not causation
Predictions all wrong, failed over and over
Show me the evidence. Even just 1 piece of solid evidence.. well you can't because it doesn't exist
Enter tweets and sewing circle jerks between the same 3 or 4 people
- Status