Off Topic Climate Change

[Diego]

1746

You must log in or register to see images

Hottest day on 18th July - temperature in shade 85 degF (29 degC)

Summer 1748

You must log in or register to see images

Hot days in June & July; temperature at 1 pm on 23rd July was 85 degF (29degC).
12th June 1748: Large hailstones, about 2 inches (50mm) in diameter, did considerable damage to windows and gardens during a thunderstorm.
1749

You must log in or register to see images

You must log in or register to see images

A dry summer. Shade temperature at about mid-day on 2nd July was 88 degF (31degC)
1790 (June)

You must log in or register to see images

Temperature of 91degF (33 degC) on 22nd June

How could this happen with CO2 so low then?!

We need to retroactively put carbon taxes on the 1700s SUV drivers in Britain


Just as well Thomas Cook wasn't in business in the 1700s @Diego

Wasting your pixels mate, if it isn't in their broadsheet it's not real.

I don't do long posts usually but once laid out an opinion based post based on 60 years of life with accompanying reasons for opinions, it covered unions, politics, immigration and a few other things. One thick twat asked me for a link

 

[Angry_Physics]

Wasting your pixels mate, if it isn't in their broadsheet it's not real.

I don't do long posts usually but once laid out an opinion based post based on 60 years of life with accompanying reasons for opinions, it covered unions, politics, immigration and a few other things. One thick twat asked me for a link

You know what, Guardian eco journos hate people like you, these preened little ****s only a week out of college think you shouldn't get to vote because "you are stealing their future", a future you worked all your life to give them You worked all your life, paid taxes, and well, the soft lives they have, we gave it to them, we built their soft lives.

What did we do?! We should have pissed it up a wall instead

 

[Angry_Physics]

****ing millennials are the worst generation in human history

A shred of adversity and they crumble

 

[Commachio]

Ok.

 

[Angry_Physics]

the freckles on my cock make it look like a cigarette filter.

OK

 

[Commachio]

****ing millennials are the worst generation in human history

A shred of adversity and they crumble

And you can conclude this how?

 

[Angry_Physics]

And you can conclude this how?

*everything is offensive
*microaggressions
*cant tolerate different opinions
*Demand free ****
*muh feels
*deems words to be "violence"

For a start like

Do you not get bored, you ruggedly handsome man?

 

[Angry_Physics]

jesus, 3:30am here, punching out, nighty night.

I'll check in tomorrow to see if LL is putting both feet in his mouth again

laterz

 

[Commachio]

*everything is offensive
*microaggressions
*cant tolerate different opinions
*Demand free ****
*muh feels
*deems words to be "violence"

For a start like

Do you not get bored, you ruggedly handsome man?

Bollox. You havn't a clue what you're talking about.

 

[Looney Leftie]

You don't even make points. You are trying to infer there is less sea ice, without showing sea ice data n even then, there is no trend in the last decade in your graph too That's for supporting my point

This is genius.

What do you think the area that isn't open water is covered in? Cream cheese.

I'll let others decide if they can see a trend

 

[Angry_Physics]

This is genius.

What do you think the area that isn't open water is covered in? Cream cheese.

I'll let others decide if they can see a trend

Morning

I think this has probably run its course. We're just trading leaky arse posts at this point

Even I get bored of it.

Don't be like Tobes and claim some sort of pathetic victory because I don't want to continue this pointless to and fro, any science based discussion, I am all for

 

[Angry_Physics]

****ing millennials are the worst generation in human history

A shred of adversity and they crumble

And you can conclude this how?

*everything is offensive
*microaggressions
*cant tolerate different opinions
*Demand free ****
*muh feels
*deems words to be "violence"

For a start like

Do you not get bored, you ruggedly handsome man?

Bollox. You havn't a clue what you're talking about.

Students See Many Slights as Racial ‘Microaggressions’
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/22/...ases-slights-get-subtler-but-still-sting.html

Microaggressions in graduate students’ lives: How they are encountered and their consequences
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X11000710

Why It's a Bad Idea to Tell Students Words Are Violence
https://www.theatlantic.com/educati...a-to-tell-students-words-are-violence/533970/

Hate Speech Is in the Eye of the Beholder(muh feels)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1948550617748728?journalCode=sppa

Millennials like socialism — until they get jobs (free **** is good until you have to pay for others' free ****)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...et-jobs/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e597a7c96552

We're obsessed with 'no platforming' but aren't resisting the return of harder censorship (different opinions triggering)
https://www.theguardian.com/comment...ent-resisting-the-return-of-harder-censorship


Not only are you ignorant, but you seem to feel the need to tell others they dont know what they are talking about, when you haven't the first clue what you are on about

Willfully Ignorant, uninformed, lazy and stupid = you (on this topic)

 

[Angry_Physics]

This is genius.

What do you think the area that isn't open water is covered in? Cream cheese.

I'll let others decide if they can see a trend

What I do notice about you and @Tobes is, you claim victory based solely on your perspectives, which also requires you omit much in order to do so.

I prefer to let the details, data, research, specifics speak for themselves.

Ah the self preservation of fragile internet egos.. is something to behold.
At least you both understand a tenet of the Art of War, namely, deny battles you cant win. (and you do this by making it a personal to and fro, as that is your level)

 

[Tobes]

What I do notice about you and @Tobes is, you claim victory based solely on your perspectives, which also requires you omit much in order to do so.

I prefer to let the details, data, research, specifics speak for themselves.

Ah the self preservation of fragile internet egos.. is something to behold.
At least you both understand a tenet of the Art of War, namely, deny battles you cant win

 

[Angry_Physics]

What I do notice about you and @Tobes is, you claim victory based solely on your perspectives, which also requires you omit much in order to do so.

I prefer to let the details, data, research, specifics speak for themselves.

Ah the self preservation of fragile internet egos.. is something to behold.
At least you both understand a tenet of the Art of War, namely, deny battles you cant win. (and you do this by making it a personal to and fro, as that is your level)

Funny cos it's true

You claimed you discredited me, more than once on this topic (that you know nothing about). Still waiting for a shred of evidence for that.
In fact you've come back with as much evidence as Loony has for his doom CO2 beliefs

You made the claim, claimed victory, then refused to discuss it further or evidence your claims, which validates my previous post above

 

[Commachio]

Morning

I think this has probably run its course. We're just trading leaky arse posts at this point

Even I get bored of it.

Don't be like Tobes and claim some sort of pathetic victory because I don't want to continue this pointless to and fro, any science based discussion, I am all for

then proceeds to write multiple posts

 

[Tobes]

Funny cos it's true

You claimed you discredited me, more than once on this topic (that you know nothing about). Still waiting for a shred of evidence for that.
In fact you've come back with as much evidence as Loony has for his doom CO2 beliefs

You made the claim, claimed victory, then refused to discuss it further or evidence your claims, which validates my previous post above

I said I discredited the sources of your information, which I did on numerous occasions.

You’ve continually regurgitated the mantra of ‘science’ thats backed by fossil fuel cash, that completely goes against the concensus - funny that.

I’ve also never said I was in any way an expert on this subject, and here’s a newsflash mate - neither are you. The fact that you’ve chosen to seek out reems of information that you’ll only consider if it conforms with your already set beliefs, is merely confirmation bias, not research.

I also said I couldn’t be arsed digging back finding the posts from back in your Sisu days.

 

[Angry_Physics]

then proceeds to write multiple posts

Yes but the content of the posts are relevant.

Context is difficult for you, I get it

 

[Angry_Physics]

I said I discredited the sources of your information, which I did on numerous occasions.

You’ve continually regurgitated the mantra of ‘science’ thats backed by fossil fuel cash, that completely goes against the concensus - funny that.

I’ve also never said I was in any way an expert on this subject, and here’s a newsflash mate - neither are you. The fact that you’ve chosen to seek out reems of information that you’ll only consider if it conforms with your already set beliefs, is merely confirmation bias, not research.

I also said I couldn’t be arsed digging back finding the posts from back in your Sisu days.

I am not interested in the rest of the gibberish bar 2 lines

1. You wont evidence your baseless claim (yet claim some sort of win which proves what I said)
2. Consensus is agreement, consensus has nothing to do with science

To elaborate on point 2. The laws of physics are not used in engineering and all other areas of science, because there is consensus. They are used because they can be proven to hold true.

You don't understand that, do you?

 

[Tobes]

I am not interested in the rest of the gibberish bar 2 lines

1. You wont evidence your baseless claim (yet claim some sort of win which proves what I said)
2. Consensus is agreement, consensus has nothing to do with science

To elaborate on point 2. The laws of physics are not used in engineering and all other areas of science, because there is consensus. They are used because they can be proven to hold true.

You don't understand that, do you?

What rules of physics are you using to definitively prove your claims then?